Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 227

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Intraspinal neural stem cell transplantation in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: Phase 1 trial outcomes

Open access
Feldman, Eva L., Boulis, Nicholas M., Hur, Junguk, Johe, Karl, Rutkove, Seward B., Federici, Thais, Polak, Meraida, Bordeau, Jane, Sakowski, Stacey A., Glass, Jonathan D.·2014·Annals of Neurology

Abstract

Objective: The US Food and Drug Administration–approved trial, “A Phase 1, Open‐Label, First‐in‐Human, Feasibility and Safety Study of Human Spinal Cord‐Derived Neural Stem Cell Transplantation for the Treatment of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, Protocol Number: NS2008‐1,” is complete. Our overall objective was to assess the safety and feasibility of stem cell transplantation into lumbar and/or cervical spinal cord regions in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) subjects. Methods: Preliminary results have been reported on the initial trial cohort of 12 ALS subjects. Here, we describe the safety and functional outcome monitoring results for the final trial cohort, consisting of 6 ALS subjects receiving 5 unilateral cervical intraspinal neural stem cell injections. Three of these subjects previously received 10 total bilateral lumbar injections as part of the earlier trial cohort. All injections utilized a novel spinal‐mounted stabilization and injection device to deliver 100,000 neural stem cells per injection, for a dosing range up to 1.5 million cells. Subject assessments included detailed pre‐ and postsurgical neurological outcome measures. Results: The cervical injection procedure was well tolerated and disease progression did not accelerate in any subject, verifying the safety and feasibility of cervical and dual‐targeting approaches. Analyses on outcome data revealed preliminary insight into potential windows of stem cell biological activity and identified clinical assessment measures that closely correlate with ALS Functional Rating Scale‐Revised scores, a standard assessment for ALS clinical trials. Interpretation: This is the first report of cervical and dual‐targeted intraspinal transplantation of neural stem cells in ALS subjects. This approach is feasible and well‐tolerated, supporting future trial phases examining therapeutic dosing and efficacy. Ann Neurol 2014;75:363–373

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ana.24113

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 227

Metadata

Authors
Feldman, E. L., Boulis, N. M., Hur, J., Johe, K., Rutkove, S. B., Federici, T., Polak, M., Bordeau, J., Sakowski, S. A., & Glass, J. D.
Venue
Annals of Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-03
Volume
75
Issue
3
Pages
363-373
ISSN
  • 0364-5134 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-8249
OpenAlex
W2134585986
Cited by
227
References
0
FWCI
19.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Intraspinal neural stem cell transplantation in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: Phase 1 trial outcomes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ana.24113
The paper
Feldman, E. L., Boulis, N. M., Hur, J., Johe, K., Rutkove, S. B., Federici, T., Polak, M., Bordeau, J., Sakowski, S. A., & Glass, J. D. (2014). Intraspinal neural stem cell transplantation in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: Phase 1 trial outcomes. Annals of Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.24113

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.