Cited by 53Traumatic Brain Injury ResearchDeep Brain Stimulation and Movement DisordersAcute Ischemic Stroke Management

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 5 of the 45 sources its claims cite were checked for support.

Thalamic strokes that severely impair arousal extend into the brainstem

Open access
Hindman, Joseph, Bowren, Mark D., Bruss, Joel, Wright, Brad, Geerling, Joel C., Boes, Aaron D.·2018·Annals of Neurology

Abstract

In this study, we evaluate the role of the thalamus in the neural circuitry of arousal. Level of consciousness within the first 12 hours of a thalamic stroke is assessed with lesion symptom mapping. Impaired arousal correlates with lesions in the paramedian posterior thalamus near the centromedian and parafascicular nuclei, posterior hypothalamus, and midbrain tegmentum. All patients with severely impaired arousal (coma, stupor) had lesion extension into the midbrain and/or pontine tegmentum, whereas purely thalamic lesions did not severely impair arousal. These results are consistent with growing evidence that pathways most critical for human arousal lie outside the thalamus. Ann Neurol 2018;84:926–930

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

In 33 patients with ischemic thalamic lesions, severe arousal impairment (coma/stupor) occurred only when lesions extended into the brainstem, whereas purely thalamic lesions did not severely impair arousal. The findings challenge the view that the human thalamus is a critical relay for arousal.

Key findings

  • Lesion-symptom mapping was significant (cross-validated correlation = 0.59; p < 0.001), with impaired arousal associated with bilateral ventromedial thalamus near the centromedian and parafascicular nuclei, posterior hypothalamus, and midbrain tegmentum; peak MNI coordinate: −3, −16, 3.
  • All 4 patients with severe arousal impairment (2 coma, 2 stupor) had infarcts extensively involving the brainstem in addition to the thalamus.
  • 12 patients with thalamic lesions with minimal to no brainstem extension were awake on presentation with no impairment of consciousness; 17 patients with intermediate midbrain extension had partial arousal impairments (obtunded, somnolent, or lethargic).
  • The authors conclude that pathways most critical for human arousal likely lie outside the thalamus, and that historical thalamic involvement may reflect shared vascular supply with brainstem arousal structures.

Methods

  • Retrospective study identifying patients from University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics electronic medical records (2000–2017) with MR imaging showing abnormal diffusion signal in the thalamus; exclusions included sepsis, alcohol or drug overdose, seizure, or trauma.
  • Sample: 23 Iowa patients (17 men, ages 63.30 ± 14.25) plus 10 patients from a previously published University of Utah artery of Percheron study (5 men, ages 50.30 ± 16.23), totaling 33 patients.
  • Arousal during the first 12 hours after symptom onset was rated on a 6-point scale (coma, 1; stupor, 2; obtunded, 3; somnolent, 4; lethargic, 5; awake, 6) by 2 neurologists blinded to imaging; lesions were mapped onto the MNI152 template using FSL and analyzed with LESYMAP sparse canonical correlation lesion-symptom mapping, with 4-fold cross-validation and voxel coverage limited to areas with damage in ≥3 patients and ≥10% of the cohort.

Limitations

  • Stated: the analysis is limited to 33 patients, and the authors cannot exclude the possibility that a purely thalamic lesion can severely impair consciousness, though they did not observe such a case.
  • Stated: most literature cases of “thalamic coma” have radiographic evidence of extension into the hypothalamus and brainstem, exam findings not consistent with coma, or signs such as ophthalmoplegia indicating pontine or midbrain damage.
  • Stated: the study focuses on arousal in the first 12 hours and does not evaluate hypersomnia or circadian rhythm disruptions reported with diencephalic lesions; future work with larger samples is needed. Evident from the text: the retrospective design and small sample limit generalizability and causal inference.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ana.25377

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

10 Not checked yet · 6 Own result · 5 Own method · 2 Check pending · 1 Partly supported · 1 Mixed support · 1 No full text of the sources · 1 No basis given · accuracy not yet measured

Verify all 33 references — free account

Show all 9 claims

  • It may state two separate claims as one. 10
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 12
18 of 18
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Level of arousal during the first 12 hours can be reliably determined retrospectively from electronic medical records and neurological exam findings.

    “The level of arousal displayed by each patient during the first 12 hours after the onset of symptoms was extrapolated from review of the electronic medical record based primarily on neurological exam findings.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The exclusion criteria of sepsis, alcohol or drug overdose, seizure, or trauma adequately exclude non-lesional causes of impaired arousal.

    “Exclusion criteria included the presence of sepsis, alcohol or drug overdose, seizure, or trauma.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The 10 patients from the previously published Utah study can be combined with the Iowa patients because the cases were analyzed using the same protocols.

    “Cases were analyzed using the same protocols as those from Iowa.”
3 of 3

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Posner JB, 2007, Posner's Diagnosis of Stupor and Coma

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 53

Metadata

Authors
Hindman, J., Bowren, M. D., Bruss, J., Wright, B., Geerling, J. C., & Boes, A. D.
Affiliations
  • University of Iowa (US)
  • University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics (US)
  • University of Utah (US)
Corresponding author
  • Geerling, Joel C.
  • Boes, Aaron D.
Venue
Annals of Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-12
Volume
84
Issue
6
Pages
926-930
ISSN
  • 0364-5134 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-8249
OpenAlex
W2900677790
Cited by
53
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1
FWCI
2.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annals of Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (K08‐NS099425K12HD027748‐24K12NS098482‐01)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Deep Brain Stimulation and Movement Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
Keywords
thalamic infarction, arousal, coma, stupor, lesion-symptom mapping, posterior thalamus, centromedian nucleus, parafascicular nucleus, posterior hypothalamus, midbrain tegmentum, pontine tegmentum, brainstem, level of consciousness
MeSH terms
Arousal, Brain Mapping, Brain Stem, Coma, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Retrospective Studies, Thalamus, Time Factors, Stroke, Imaging, Three-Dimensional, Stupor

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-11, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-11 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review