The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Local cerebral glucose utilization in the normal conscious macaque monkey
Abstract
The [14 C] deoxyglucose method for quantitative determination of local cerebral glucose utilization was extended to the macaque monkey. The necessary constants required by its operational equation were evaluated. The lumped constant, measured in 7 normal conscious monkeys, was found to equal 0.344 (SEM, ± 0.036). The rate constants were also estimated and found to be very similar to those obtained previously in the rat. With these essential constants evaluated, the method was applied to normal conscious monkeys. Local cerebral glucose utilization was found to vary markedly throughout the brain but to fall within two distributions, a higher one in gray matter and a lower one in white matter. In general, the values fell in a range to be expected from previous measurements of average energy metabolism in the brain as a whole. The values were considerably lower than those observed previously in the conscious rat. Marked heterogeneity of rates of glucose utilization were observed in a number of anatomical structures. In some cases the patterns of heterogeneity were consistent with known histological cytoarchitecture; in others the heterogeneity did not conform with known cytoarchitectural features but corresponded to patterns previously demonstrated by electrophysiological techniques. Many of the regions of the cerebral cortex showed columnar patterns of distribution of higher and lower rates of glucose utilization. These may be a metabolic reflection of the columnar organization of function within the cerebral cortex.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sokoloff, L., Reivich, M., Kennedy, C., Rosiers, M. H. D., Patlak, C. S., Pettigrew, K. D., Sakurada, O., & Shinohara, M. (1977) · Journal of Neurochemistry · doi:10.1111/j.1471-4159.1977.tb10649.x · Cited by 6,000
Self-citationShape and arrangement of columns in cat's striate cortex
Hubel, D. H., & Wiesel, T. N. (1963) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1963.sp007079 · Cited by 834
Cited by
An Energy Budget for Signaling in the Grey Matter of the Brain
Attwell, D., & Laughlin, S. B. (2001) · Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism · doi:10.1097/00004647-200110000-00001 · Cited by 3,543
Oxidative damage to mitochondrial DNA shows marked age-dependent increases in human brain
Mecocci, P., MacGarvey, U., Kaufman, A. E., Koontz, D., Shoffner, J. M., Wallace, D. C., & Beal, M. F. (1993) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.410340416 · Cited by 757
Sokoloff, L. (1981) · Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism · doi:10.1038/jcbfm.1981.4 · Cited by 580
Self-citationGjedde, A. (1982) · Brain Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/0165-0173(82)90018-2 · Cited by 414
Computerized densitometry and color coding of [14C] deoxyglucose autoradiographs
Goochee, C., Rasband, W., & Sokoloff, L. (1980) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.410070414 · Cited by 344
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Kennedy, C., Sakurada, O., Shinohara, M., Jehle, J., & Sokoloff, L.
- Venue
- Annals of Neurology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1978-10
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 293-301
- ISSN
- 0364-5134 (ISSN-L)
- 1531-8249
- OpenAlex
- W2046723869
- Cited by
- 246
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 3.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Local cerebral glucose utilization in the normal conscious macaque monkey. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ana.410040402
- The paper
- Kennedy, C., Sakurada, O., Shinohara, M., Jehle, J., & Sokoloff, L. (1978). Local cerebral glucose utilization in the normal conscious macaque monkey. Annals of Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.410040402
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.