Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 955

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A quantitative model for the in vivo assessment of drug binding sites with positron emission tomography

Mintun, Mark A., Raichle, Marcus E., Kilbourn, Michael R., Wooten, G. Frederick, Welch, Michael J.·1984·Annals of Neurology

Abstract

We propose an in vivo method for use with positron emission tomography (PET) that results in a quantitative characterization of neuroleptic binding sites using radiolabeled spiperone. The data are analyzed using a mathematical model that describes transport, nonspecific binding, in the brain. The model demonstrates that the receptor quantities Bmax (i.e., the number of binding sites) and K D−1 (i.e., the binding affinity) are not separably ascertainable with tracer methodology in human subjects. We have, therefore, introduced a new term, the binding potential, equivalent to the product Bmax K D−1, which reflects the capacity of a given tissue, or region of a tissue, for ligand‐binding site interaction. The procedure for obtaining these measurements is illustrated with data from sequential PET scans of baboons after intravenous injection of carrier‐added [18 F]spiperone. From these data we estimate the brain tissue nonspecific binding of spiperone to be in the range of 94.2 to 95.3%, and the regional brain spiperone permeability (measured as the permeability–surface area product) to be in the range of 0.025 to 0.036 cm 3/(s·ml). The binding potential of the striatum ranged from 17.4 to 21.6; these in vivo estimates compare favourably to in vitro values in the literature. To our knowledge this represents the first direct evidence that PET can be used to characterize quantitatively, locally and in vivo, drug binding sites in brain. The ability to make such measurements with PET should permit the detailed investigation of diseases thought to result from disorders of receptor function.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ana.410150302

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 955

Metadata

Authors
Mintun, M. A., Raichle, M. E., Kilbourn, M. R., Wooten, G. F., & Welch, M. J.
Venue
Annals of Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1984-03
Volume
15
Issue
3
Pages
217-227
ISSN
  • 0364-5134 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-8249
OpenAlex
W2121887890
Cited by
955
References
0
FWCI
26.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A quantitative model for the in vivo assessment of drug binding sites with positron emission tomography. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ana.410150302
The paper
Mintun, M. A., Raichle, M. E., Kilbourn, M. R., Wooten, G. F., & Welch, M. J. (1984). A quantitative model for the in vivo assessment of drug binding sites with positron emission tomography. Annals of Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.410150302

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.