The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A rating scale for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: Description and preliminary experience
Abstract
A rating scale has been developed to provide a quantitative estimate of clinical status and disease progression in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). This scale includes assessment of swallowing, speech, and respiratory function, and both strength and function of upper and lower extremity musculature. The evaluation is relatively simple to perform and yields reproducible data for both a total ALS score and a score for each group of functions tested. A score of 30 points is normal; 164 points indicates maximal dysfunction. The total ALS score increased in a linear fashion in each of 74 patients followed for at least one year. Among patients, the rate of disease progression varied twenty‐fold, with a continuous distribution from the slowest to most rapid course. Thirty‐four percent of patients exhibited a rapid change of greater than 48 points in the year, predicting progression to a terminal stage in less than two years; 19% of patients exhibited a slow change of less than 13 points in one year, predicting progression to a terminal stage over at least five years. This ALS scoring system should permit more accurate assessment of drug efficacy in clinical trials ánd correlation of rates of progression with clinical variables.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Mitchell, J., & Borasio, G. (2007) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(07)60944-1 · Cited by 561
Assessment of a disease-specific muscular impairment rating scale in myotonic dystrophy
Mathieu, J., Boivin, H., Meunier, D., Gaudreault, M., & Bégin, P. (2001) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.56.3.336 · Cited by 384
A placebo-controlled trial of insulin-like growth factor-I in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
Borasio, G. D., Robberecht, W., Leigh, P. N., Emile, J., Guiloff, R. J., Jerusalem, F., Silani, V., Vos, P. E., Wokke, J. H. J., Dobbins, T., et al. (1998) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.51.2.583 · Cited by 340
The cognitive profile of ALS: a systematic review and meta-analysis update
Beeldman, E., Raaphorst, J., Klein Twennaar, M., de Visser, M., Schmand, B. A., & de Haan, R. J. (2016) · Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry · doi:10.1136/jnnp-2015-310734 · Cited by 313
Czaplinski, A. (2005) · Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry · doi:10.1136/jnnp.2005.072660 · Cited by 273
Metadata
- Authors
- Appel, V., Stewart, S. S., Smith, G., & Appel, S. H.
- Venue
- Annals of Neurology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1987-09
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 328-333
- ISSN
- 0364-5134 (ISSN-L)
- 1531-8249
- OpenAlex
- W2019840264
- Cited by
- 226
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A rating scale for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: Description and preliminary experience. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ana.410220308
- The paper
- Appel, V., Stewart, S. S., Smith, G., & Appel, S. H. (1987). A rating scale for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: Description and preliminary experience. Annals of Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.410220308
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.