The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The glutamate antagonist MK‐801 reduces focal ischemic brain damage in the rat
Abstract
Excessive activation of the N‐methyl‐D‐aspartate (NMDA) subtype of glutamate receptor has been implicated in the sequence of neurochemical events that results in irreversible neuronal damage in cerebral ischemia. The effects of the NMDA antagonist (+) ‐5‐methyl‐10,ll‐dihydro‐5H‐dibenzo[a,d]cyclohepten‐5,10‐imine maleate (MK‐801) upon the amount of ischemic brain damage has been assessed quantitatively in the lightly anesthetized rat. Focal cerebral ischemia was produced by the permanent occlusion of one middle cerebral artery (MCA), and the animals were killed 3 hours after the arterial occlusion. MK‐801 (0.5 mg/kg) was administered intravenously either 30 minutes prior to MCA occlusion or 30 minutes after the induction of ischemia. Pretreatment with MK‐801 reduced the volume of ischemic damage both in the cerebral cortex (by 38% compared with untreated rats with MCA occlusion; p < 0.01) and in the caudate nucleus (by 18% compared with controls; p < 0.05). Treatment with MK‐801, initiated 30 minutes after MCA occlusion, reduced the volume of ischemic damage in the cerebral cortex (by 52% compared with controls; p < 0.01). The volume of ischemic damage in the caudate nucleus was minimally influenced by MK‐801 treatment initiated after MCA occlusion. The antiischemic effects of MK‐801 were readily demonstrable despite the hypotension that MK‐801 induced in rats anesthetized with halothane (0.5%), nitrous oxide (70%), and oxygen (30%). The potency of MK‐801 in reducing ischemic brain damage, even when administered after the induction of ischemia, highlights the potential use of NMDA receptor antagonists for the treatment of focal cerebral ischemia in humans.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bederson, J. B., Pitts, L. H., Tsuji, M., Nishimura, M. C., Davis, R. L., & Bartkowski, H. (1986) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.17.3.472 · Cited by 2,681
MacDermott, A. B., Mayer, M. L., Westbrook, G. L., Smith, S. J., & Barker, J. L. (1986) · Nature · doi:10.1038/321519a0 · Cited by 1,835
Cited by
Ischemic Cell Death in Brain Neurons
Lipton, P. (1999) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.1999.79.4.1431 · Cited by 3,043
Excitotoxicity and stroke: Identifying novel targets for neuroprotection
Lai, T. W., Zhang, S., & Wang, Y. T. (2014) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2013.11.006 · Cited by 1,106
Chronic Glutamate Toxicity in Neurodegenerative Diseases—What is the Evidence?
Lewerenz, J., & Maher, P. (2015) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2015.00469 · Cited by 718
Role of adaptive plasticity in recovery of function after damage to motor cortex
Nudo, R. J., Plautz, E. J., & Frost, S. B. (2001) · Muscle & Nerve · doi:10.1002/mus.1104 · Cited by 561
Clinical Experience With Excitatory Amino Acid Antagonist Drugs
Muir, K. W., & Lees, K. R. (1995) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.26.3.503 · Cited by 502
Metadata
- Authors
- Park, C. K., Nehls, D. G., Graham, D. I., Teasdale, G. M., & McCulloch, J.
- Venue
- Annals of Neurology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1988-10
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 543-551
- ISSN
- 0364-5134 (ISSN-L)
- 1531-8249
- OpenAlex
- W2050039091
- Cited by
- 539
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 27.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The glutamate antagonist MK‐801 reduces focal ischemic brain damage in the rat. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ana.410240411
- The paper
- Park, C. K., Nehls, D. G., Graham, D. I., Teasdale, G. M., & McCulloch, J. (1988). The glutamate antagonist MK‐801 reduces focal ischemic brain damage in the rat. Annals of Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.410240411
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.