The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Major differences in the dynamics of primary and secondary progressive multiple sclerosis
Abstract
In patients with primary and secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (MS), major differences in the pattern and extent of abnormality on cerebral magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) between the two groups have recently been demonstrated. In the present study, 24 patients, matched for age, sex, duration of disease, and disability, had serial gadolinium diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid–enhanced MRI over a 6‐month period. The 12 patients in the secondary progressive group had a total of 109 new lesions over this time (18.2 lesions per patient per year) and 87% of these enhanced. Enhancement also occurred within and at the edge of preexisting lesions. In contrast, only 20 new lesions were seen in the primary progressive group (3.3 lesions per patient per year) and only one of these enhanced. There was no difference in the degree of clinical deterioration between the two groups over the 6‐month period. These findings may indicate a difference in the dynamics of disease activity between the two forms of progressive MS, particularly in relation to the inflammatory component of the lesions, and have important implications for the selection of patients and the monitoring of disease activity in therapeutic trials.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: An expanded disability status scale (EDSS)
Kurtzke, J. F. (1983) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.33.11.1444 · Cited by 15,011
The longstanding MS lesion. A quantitative MRI and electron microscopic study
BARNES, D., MUNRO, P. M. G., YOUL, B. D., PRINEAS, J. W., & MCDONALD, W. I. (1991) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/114.3.1271 · Cited by 256
Self-citation
Cited by
Defining the clinical course of multiple sclerosis: The 2013 revisions
Lublin, F. D., Reingold, S. C., Cohen, J. A., Cutter, G. R., Sørensen, P. S., Thompson, A. J., Wolinsky, J. S., Balcer, L. J., Banwell, B., Barkhof, F., et al. (2014) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000000560 · Cited by 3,177
Self-citationCortical demyelination and diffuse white matter injury in multiple sclerosis
Kutzelnigg, A., Lucchinetti, C. F., Stadelmann, C., Brück, W., Rauschka, H., Bergmann, M., Schmidbauer, M., Parisi, J. E., & Lassmann, H. (2005) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awh641 · Cited by 1,836
A Controlled Trial of Natalizumab for Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis
Miller, D. H., Khan, O. A., Sheremata, W. A., Blumhardt, L. D., Rice, G. P. A., Libonati, M. A., Willmer-Hulme, A. J., Dalton, C. M., Miszkiel, K. A., & O'Connor, P. W. (2003) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa020696 · Cited by 1,242
The Immunopathology of Multiple Sclerosis: An Overview
Lassmann, H., Brück, W., & Lucchinetti, C. F. (2007) · Brain Pathology · doi:10.1111/j.1750-3639.2007.00064.x · Cited by 1,182
Primary-progressive multiple sclerosis
Miller, D. H., & Leary, S. M. (2007) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(07)70243-0 · Cited by 818
Metadata
- Authors
- Thompson, A. J., Kermode, A. G., Wicks, D., MacManus, D. G., Kendall, B. E., Kingsley, D. P. E., & McDonald, W. I.
- Venue
- Annals of Neurology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1991-01
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 53-62
- ISSN
- 0364-5134 (ISSN-L)
- 1531-8249
- OpenAlex
- W2026222025
- Cited by
- 486
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 20.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Major differences in the dynamics of primary and secondary progressive multiple sclerosis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ana.410290111
- The paper
- Thompson, A. J., Kermode, A. G., Wicks, D., MacManus, D. G., Kendall, B. E., Kingsley, D. P. E., & McDonald, W. I. (1991). Major differences in the dynamics of primary and secondary progressive multiple sclerosis. Annals of Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.410290111
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.