The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Anti‐Ri: An antibody associated with paraneoplastic opsoclonus and breast cancer
Abstract
The serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of 8 women with ataxia, 6 of whom also had eye movement abnormalities believed to be opsoclonus, were found to contain a highly specific antineuronal antibody we call anti‐Ri. Seven of the 8 women also had or developed cancer: carcinoma of the breast in 5, adenocarcinoma in an axillary lymph node in 1, and carcinoma of the fallopian tube in 1. Four patients presented with the neurological disorder; the cancer was diagnosed first in the other 4. Immunohistochemical studies using serum or CSF from all 8 patients revealed a highly specific antibody interaction with central nervous system neuronal nuclei but not with glial or other cells; the titer ranged from 1:5,000 to 1:320,000 in serum and from 1:2,000 to 1:16,000 in CSF. Biotinylated IgG from the patients' serum reacted with the tumors of 3 of 4 patients with anti‐Ri antibody but not with breast cancers from patients without anti‐Ri antibody. Immunoblots against cerebral cortex neuronal extracts identified protein antigens of 55‐kd and 80‐kd relative molecular mass. Serum titers by immunoblot ranged from 1:500 to more than 1:40,000 and CSF titers, from 1:10 to 1:2,000. The relative amount of anti‐Ri was always higher in CSF than in serum. The antibody was not present in sera from normal individuals; patients with breast cancer without opsoclonus; other patients with opsoclonus; or patients with other paraneoplastic syndromes related to breast, ovarian, or small‐cell lung cancer. We conclude that the presence of anti‐Ri antibody identifies a subset of patients with paraneoplastic ataxia and eye movement disorders (opsoclonus) who usually suffer from breast or other gynecological cancer; the antibody when present is a useful marker for an underlying malignancy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Paraneoplastic syndromes of the CNS
Dalmau, J., & Rosenfeld, M. R. (2008) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(08)70060-7 · Cited by 873
Shams’ili, S., Grefkens, J., de Leeuw, B., van den Bent, M., Hooijkaas, H., van der Holt, B., Vecht, C., & Sillevis Smitt, P. (2003) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awg133 · Cited by 579
Nova-1 Regulates Neuron-Specific Alternative Splicing and Is Essential for Neuronal Viability
Jensen, K. B., Dredge, B. K., Stefani, G., Zhong, R., Buckanovich, R. J., Okano, H. J., Yang, Y. Y. L., & Darnell, R. B. (2000) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80900-9 · Cited by 426
Yang, Y. Y. L., Yin, G. L., & Darnell, R. B. (1998) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.95.22.13254 · Cited by 219
The neuronal RNA binding protein Nova-1 recognizes specific RNA targets in vitro and in vivo
Buckanovich, R. J., & Darnell, R. B. (1997) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.17.6.3194 · Cited by 217
Metadata
- Authors
- Luque, F. A., Furneaux, H. M., Ferziger, R., Rosenblum, M. K., Wray, S. H., Schold, S. C., Glantz, M. J., Jaeckle, K. A., Biran, H., Lesser, M., Paulsen, W. A., River, M. E., & Posner, J. B.
- Venue
- Annals of Neurology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1991-03
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 241-251
- ISSN
- 0364-5134 (ISSN-L)
- 1531-8249
- OpenAlex
- W1979369853
- Cited by
- 402
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Anti‐Ri: An antibody associated with paraneoplastic opsoclonus and breast cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ana.410290303
- The paper
- Luque, F. A., Furneaux, H. M., Ferziger, R., Rosenblum, M. K., Wray, S. H., Schold, S. C., Glantz, M. J., Jaeckle, K. A., Biran, H., Lesser, M., Paulsen, W. A., River, M. E., & Posner, J. B. (1991). Anti‐Ri: An antibody associated with paraneoplastic opsoclonus and breast cancer. Annals of Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.410290303
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.