Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 512

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Disease‐specific patterns of locus coeruleus cell loss

German, Dwight C., Manaye, Kebreten F., White, Charles L, Woodward, Donald J., McIntire, Donald D., Smith, Wade K., Kalaria, Rajesh N., Mann, David M. A.·1992·Annals of Neurology

Abstract

Computer visualization techniques were used to map and to quantitatively reconstruct the entire locus coeruleus, including the nucleus subcoeruleus, to compare the topographic patterns of cell loss in postmortem brains from patients with Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's disease, and Down syndrome. There was comparable cell loss in all three diseases (approximately 60%) compared with aged normal subjects, and there was a significant loss of nucleus subcoeruleus cells specifically in patients with Parkinson's disease (63%). There was a significant positive correlation between the magnitude of locus coeruleus cell loss and the duration of Alzheimer's disease, but no such correlation was found for Parkinson's disease. In patients with Parkinson's disease, there was comparable cell loss throughout the rostral‐caudal extent of the nucleus; however, in patients with Alzheimer's disease and Down syndrome, the greatest cell loss always occurred within the rostral portion of the nucleus, with a relative sparing of caudal cells. These data are consistent with the hypothesis that cell loss in Parkinson's disease is the result of a pathological process that attacks the catecholaminergic cells of the locus coeruleus and the subcoeruleus in general; in Alzheimer's disease and Down syndrome, however, the pathological process only affects the rostral, cortical‐projecting locus coeruleus cells and spares the caudal, noncortical‐projecting cells.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ana.410320510

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 512

Metadata

Authors
German, D. C., Manaye, K. F., White, C. L., Woodward, D. J., McIntire, D. D., Smith, W. K., Kalaria, R. N., & Mann, D. M. A.
Venue
Annals of Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1992-11
Volume
32
Issue
5
Pages
667-676
ISSN
  • 0364-5134 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-8249
OpenAlex
W2093271285
Cited by
512
References
2
FWCI
4.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Disease‐specific patterns of locus coeruleus cell loss. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ana.410320510
The paper
German, D. C., Manaye, K. F., White, C. L., Woodward, D. J., McIntire, D. D., Smith, W. K., Kalaria, R. N., & Mann, D. M. A. (1992). Disease‐specific patterns of locus coeruleus cell loss. Annals of Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.410320510

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.