The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Disease‐specific patterns of locus coeruleus cell loss
Abstract
Computer visualization techniques were used to map and to quantitatively reconstruct the entire locus coeruleus, including the nucleus subcoeruleus, to compare the topographic patterns of cell loss in postmortem brains from patients with Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's disease, and Down syndrome. There was comparable cell loss in all three diseases (approximately 60%) compared with aged normal subjects, and there was a significant loss of nucleus subcoeruleus cells specifically in patients with Parkinson's disease (63%). There was a significant positive correlation between the magnitude of locus coeruleus cell loss and the duration of Alzheimer's disease, but no such correlation was found for Parkinson's disease. In patients with Parkinson's disease, there was comparable cell loss throughout the rostral‐caudal extent of the nucleus; however, in patients with Alzheimer's disease and Down syndrome, the greatest cell loss always occurred within the rostral portion of the nucleus, with a relative sparing of caudal cells. These data are consistent with the hypothesis that cell loss in Parkinson's disease is the result of a pathological process that attacks the catecholaminergic cells of the locus coeruleus and the subcoeruleus in general; in Alzheimer's disease and Down syndrome, however, the pathological process only affects the rostral, cortical‐projecting locus coeruleus cells and spares the caudal, noncortical‐projecting cells.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Estimation of nuclear population from microtome sections
Abercrombie, M. (1946) · The Anatomical Record · doi:10.1002/ar.1090940210 · Cited by 4,363
Effects of putative neurotransmitters on neuronal activity in monkey auditory cortex
Foote, S. L., Freedman, R., & Oliver, A. P. (1975) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/0006-8993(75)90699-x · Cited by 458
Cited by
Classification and basic pathology of Alzheimer disease
Duyckaerts, C., Delatour, B., & Potier, M.-C. (2009) · Acta Neuropathologica · doi:10.1007/s00401-009-0532-1 · Cited by 1,031
Role of locus coeruleus in attention and behavioral flexibility
Aston-Jones, G., Rajkowski, J., & Cohen, J. (1999) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s0006-3223(99)00140-7 · Cited by 900
The pathological process underlying Alzheimer’s disease in individuals under thirty
Braak, H., & Del Tredici, K. (2011) · Acta Neuropathologica · doi:10.1007/s00401-010-0789-4 · Cited by 812
Inflammatory processes in Alzheimer's disease
Heneka, M. T., & O'Banion, M. K. (2007) · Journal of Neuroimmunology · doi:10.1016/j.jneuroim.2006.11.017 · Cited by 782
Iba, M., Guo, J. L., McBride, J. D., Zhang, B., Trojanowski, J. Q., & Lee, V. M.-Y. (2013) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2642-12.2013 · Cited by 664
Metadata
- Authors
- German, D. C., Manaye, K. F., White, C. L., Woodward, D. J., McIntire, D. D., Smith, W. K., Kalaria, R. N., & Mann, D. M. A.
- Venue
- Annals of Neurology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1992-11
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 667-676
- ISSN
- 0364-5134 (ISSN-L)
- 1531-8249
- OpenAlex
- W2093271285
- Cited by
- 512
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 4.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Disease‐specific patterns of locus coeruleus cell loss. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ana.410320510
- The paper
- German, D. C., Manaye, K. F., White, C. L., Woodward, D. J., McIntire, D. D., Smith, W. K., Kalaria, R. N., & Mann, D. M. A. (1992). Disease‐specific patterns of locus coeruleus cell loss. Annals of Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.410320510
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.