Cited by 900Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeural dynamics and brain function

Role of locus coeruleus in attention and behavioral flexibility

Open access
Aston-Jones, Gary, Rajkowski, Janusz, Cohen, Jonathan·1999·Biological Psychiatry

Abstract

Previous findings have implicated the noradrenergic locus coeruleus (LC) system in functions along the dimension of arousal or attention. It has remained uncertain what role this system has in attention, or what mechanisms may be involved. We review our recent work examining activity of LC neurons in monkeys performing a visual discrimination task that requires focused attention. Results indicate that LC cells exhibit phasic or tonic modes of activity, that closely correspond to good or poor performance on this task, respectively. A computational model was used to simulate these results. This model predicts that alterations in electrotonic coupling among LC cells may produce the different modes of activity and corresponding differences in performance. This model also indicates that the phasic mode of LC activity may promote focused or selective attention, whereas the tonic mode may produce a state of high behavioral flexibility or scanning attentiveness. The implications of these results for clinical disorders such as attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, stress disorders, and emotional and affective disorders are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0006-3223(99)00140-7

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Aston-Jones, G., Rajkowski, J., & Cohen, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • Princeton University (US)
Venue
Biological Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1999-11
Volume
46
Issue
9
Pages
1309-1320
ISSN
0006-3223 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2007311340
Cited by
900
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 54 · 2024: 49 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 50 · 2015: 39 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 33
FWCI
1.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biological Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Rutgers University Community Repository (Rutgers University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01mh055309-05)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH059978, MH 59978, MH-55309)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
Keywords
locus coeruleus, noradrenergic system, attention, behavioral flexibility, phasic neuronal activity, tonic neuronal activity, electrical coupling, computational model, visual discrimination task, focused attention, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, stress disorders
MeSH terms
Animals, Haplorhini, Attention, Behavior, Animal, Locus Coeruleus, Neurons, Norepinephrine, Neural Networks, Computer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review