The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Diagnostic guidelines in central nervous system Whipple's disease
Abstract
Many cases of central nervous system (CNS) Whipple's disease are not diagnosed until postmortem. Few reviews of CNS Whipple's disease have delineated the frequencies of abnormalities on neurological examination, cerebrospinal fluid studies, neuroimaging, and intestinal biopsy studies. Guidelines for diagnosis and treatment have not been proposed. In this review we present 3 new cases of CNS Whipple's disease and summarize the literature to determine the frequencies of neurological signs and abnormalities on diagnostic testing. We propose guidelines for diagnostic screening, selection for biopsy, and treatment. Review of the 84 cases of CNS Whipple's disease (81 in the literature, 3 new) revealed that 80% of the patients had systemic signs. Cognitive changes were frequent (71%), and 47% with cognitive changes also had psychiatric signs. Oculomasticatory myorhythmia and oculo‐facial‐skeletal myorhythmia, pathognomic for CNS Whipple's disease, were present in 20% of patients, and were always accompanied by a supranuclear vertical gaze palsy. Tissue biopsy was a sensitive technique; 89% of those who had biopsies had positive biopsy results. Diagnosis and treatment of definite CNS Whipple's disease should be based on the presence of pathognomic signs (oculomasticatory myorhythmia or oculo‐facial‐skeletal myorhythmia) or positive biopsy or polymerase chain reaction results. Possible CNS Whipple's disease should be diagnosed in the setting of unexplained systemic symptoms and neurological signs (supranuclear vertical gaze palsy, rhythmic myoclonus, dementia with psychiatric symptoms, or hypothalamic manifestations). Those with possible CNS Whipple's diseae should undergo small‐bowel biopsy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Whipple's disease: new aspects of pathogenesis and treatment
Schneider, T., Moos, V., Loddenkemper, C., Marth, T., Fenollar, F., & Raoult, D. (2008) · The Lancet Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(08)70042-2 · Cited by 373
Geschwind, M. D., Haman, A., & Miller, B. L. (2007) · Neurologic Clinics · doi:10.1016/j.ncl.2007.04.001 · Cited by 143
Metadata
- Authors
- Louis, E. D., Lynch, T., Kaufmann, P., Fahn, S., & Odel, J.
- Venue
- Annals of Neurology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1996-10
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 561-568
- ISSN
- 0364-5134 (ISSN-L)
- 1531-8249
- OpenAlex
- W2046700480
- Cited by
- 300
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Diagnostic guidelines in central nervous system Whipple's disease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ana.410400404
- The paper
- Louis, E. D., Lynch, T., Kaufmann, P., Fahn, S., & Odel, J. (1996). Diagnostic guidelines in central nervous system Whipple's disease. Annals of Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.410400404
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.