Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 474

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Ischemic lesion volumes in acute stroke by diffusion‐weighted magnetic resonance imaging correlate with clinical outcome

Löuvbld, Karl‐Olof, Baird, Alison E., Schlaug, Gottfried, Benfield, Andrew, Siewert, Bettina, Voetsch, Barbara, Connor, Ann, Burzynski, Cara, Edelman, Robert R., Warach, Steven·1997·Annals of Neurology

Abstract

Diffusion‐weighted magnetic resonance imaging detects ischemic injury within minutes after onset, and has been used to demonstrate drug efficacy in animal models of stroke. In 50 patients diagnosed with acute ischemic stroke ( < 24‐hour duration) within the middle cerebral artery territory, lesion volume was measured by diffusion‐weighted imaging. Thirty‐four patients also had volumes measured by T2‐weighted imaging chronically (median time, 7.5 weeks; mean, 15.9 weeks). Clinical severity was measured by the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale Score and the Barthel index. Acute lesion volumes correlated with the acute stroke scale score (r = 0.56), the chronic stroke scale score (r = 0.63), and chronic lesion volumes (r = 0.84). Chronic volumes correlated with the chronic stroke scale score (r = 0.86) and the Barthel index (r = −0.60). When only cortically based lesions were considered, the correlations relating acute lesion volume measured by diffusion‐weighted imaging (r = 0.61) and chronic lesion volume measured by T2‐weighted imaging (r = 0.90) to the chronic stroke scale score were higher. These results provide evidence that lesion volumes determined by diffusion‐weighted imaging acutely may be predictive of clinical severity and outcome, and may support a role for diffusion‐weighted imaging in the assessment of acute stroke therapies in clinical trials.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ana.410420206

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 474

Metadata

Authors
Löuvbld, K., Baird, A. E., Schlaug, G., Benfield, A., Siewert, B., Voetsch, B., Connor, A., Burzynski, C., Edelman, R. R., & Warach, S.
Venue
Annals of Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1997-08
Volume
42
Issue
2
Pages
164-170
ISSN
  • 0364-5134 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-8249
OpenAlex
W2006065208
Cited by
474
References
3
FWCI
21.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ischemic lesion volumes in acute stroke by diffusion‐weighted magnetic resonance imaging correlate with clinical outcome. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ana.410420206
The paper
Löuvbld, K., Baird, A. E., Schlaug, G., Benfield, A., Siewert, B., Voetsch, B., Connor, A., Burzynski, C., Edelman, R. R., & Warach, S. (1997). Ischemic lesion volumes in acute stroke by diffusion‐weighted magnetic resonance imaging correlate with clinical outcome. Annals of Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.410420206

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.