Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 380

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Morphometry of in vivo human white matter association pathways with diffusion‐weighted magnetic resonance imaging

Makris, N., Worth, A. J., Papadimitriou, G. M., Stakes, J. W., Caviness, V. S., Kennedy, D. N., Pandya, D. N., Kaplan, E., Sorensen, A. G., Wu, O., Reese, T. G., Wedeen, V. J., Rosen, B. R., Kennedy, D. N., Davis, T. L.·1997·Annals of Neurology

Abstract

The precise characterization of cortical connectivity is important for the understanding of brain morphological and functional organization. Such connectivity is conveyed by specific pathways or tracts in the white matter. Diffusion‐weighted magnetic resonance imaging detects the diffusivity of water molecules in three dimensions. Diffusivity in anisotropic in oriented tissues such as fiber tracts. In the present study, we used this method to map (in terms of orientation, location, and size) the “stem” (compact portion) of the principal association, projection, and commissural white matter pathways of the human brain in vivo, in 3 normal subjects. In addition, its use in clinical neurology is illustrated in a patient with left inferior parietal lobule embolic infarction in whom a significant reduction in relative size of the stem of the left superior longitudinal fasciculus was observed. This represents an important method for the characterization of major association pathways in the living human that are not discernible by conventional magnetic resonance imaging. In the clinical domain, this method will have a potential impact on the understanding of the diseases that involve white matter such as stroke, multiple sclerosis, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, head injury, and spinal cord injury.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ana.410420617

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 380

Metadata

Authors
Makris, N., Worth, A. J., Papadimitriou, G. M., Stakes, J. W., Caviness, V. S., Kennedy, D. N., Pandya, D. N., Kaplan, E., Sorensen, A. G., Wu, O., Reese, T. G., Wedeen, V. J., Rosen, B. R., Kennedy, D. N., & Davis, T. L.
Venue
Annals of Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1997-12
Volume
42
Issue
6
Pages
951-962
ISSN
  • 0364-5134 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-8249
OpenAlex
W2058986306
Cited by
380
References
2
FWCI
16.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Morphometry of in vivo human white matter association pathways with diffusion‐weighted magnetic resonance imaging. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ana.410420617
The paper
Makris, N., Worth, A. J., Papadimitriou, G. M., Stakes, J. W., Caviness, V. S., Kennedy, D. N., Pandya, D. N., Kaplan, E., Sorensen, A. G., Wu, O., Reese, T. G., Wedeen, V. J., Rosen, B. R., Kennedy, D. N., & Davis, T. L. (1997). Morphometry of in vivo human white matter association pathways with diffusion‐weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Annals of Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.410420617

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.