Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 232

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Chronic levodopa is not toxic for remaining dopamine neurons, but instead promotes their recovery, in rats with moderate nigrostriatal lesions

Murer, M. Gustavo, Dziewczapolski, Gustavo, Menalled, Liliana B., García, M. Carmen, Agid, Yves, Gershanik, Oscar, Raisman‐Vozari, Rita·1998·Annals of Neurology

Abstract

Orally administered levodopa remains the most effective symptomatic treatment for Parkinson's disease (PD). The introduction of levodopa therapy is often delayed, however, because of the fear that it might be toxic for the remaining dopaminergic neurons and, thus, accelerate the deterioration of patients. However, in vivo evidence of levodopa toxicity is scarce. We have evaluated the effects of a 6‐month oral levodoapa treatment on several dopaminergic markers, in rats with moderate or severe 6‐hydroxydopamine‐induced lesions of mesencephalic dopamine neurons and sham‐lesioned animals. Counts of tyrosine hydroxylase (TH)‐immunoreactive neurons in the substantia nigra and ventral tegmental area showed no significant difference between levodopa‐treated and vehicle‐treated rats. In addition, for rats of the sham‐lesioned and severely lesioned groups, immunoradiolabeling for TH, the dopamine transporter (DAT), and the vesicular monoamine transporter (VMAT2) at the striatal level was not significantly defferent between rats treated with levodopa or vehicle. It was unexpected that quantification of immunoautoradiograms showed a partial recovery of all three dopaminergic markers (TH, DAT, and VMAT2) in the denervated territories of the striatum of moderately lesioned rats receiving levodopa. Furthermore, the density of TH‐positive fibers observed in moderately lesioned rats was higher in those treated chronically with levodopa than in those receiving vehicle. Last, that chronic levodopa administration reversed the up‐regulation of D2 dopamine receptors seen in severely lesioned rats provided evidence that levodopa reached a biologically active concentration at the basal ganglia. Our results demonstrate that a pharmacologically effective 6‐month oral levodopa treatment is not toxic for remaining dopamine neurons in a rat model of PD but instead promotes the recovery of striatal innervation in rats with partial lesions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ana.410430504

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 232

Metadata

Authors
Murer, M. G., Dziewczapolski, G., Menalled, L. B., García, M. C., Agid, Y., Gershanik, O., & Raisman‐Vozari, R.
Venue
Annals of Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1998-05
Volume
43
Issue
5
Pages
561-575
ISSN
  • 0364-5134 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-8249
OpenAlex
W1995262065
Cited by
232
References
3
FWCI
12.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Chronic levodopa is not toxic for remaining dopamine neurons, but instead promotes their recovery, in rats with moderate nigrostriatal lesions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ana.410430504
The paper
Murer, M. G., Dziewczapolski, G., Menalled, L. B., García, M. C., Agid, Y., Gershanik, O., & Raisman‐Vozari, R. (1998). Chronic levodopa is not toxic for remaining dopamine neurons, but instead promotes their recovery, in rats with moderate nigrostriatal lesions. Annals of Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.410430504

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.