The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Zur Theorie der Gravitation vom Standpunkt des Relativitätsprinzips
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“the inertial mass, as defined in (9), then vanishes, in agreement with [5] : the strong equivalence principle is violated in such theories.”
From Nordstrom's scalar theory of gravity and the equivalence principle (2011) · cites this paper as [5]
In the citing paper
“R = 24πGg αβ T αβ , C αβ µν = 0,(6)”
From General relativity in (1 + 1) dimensions (2008) · cites this paper as [12]
In the citing paper
“The theory is the direct (1 + 1)-dimensional analog of a theory of gravity in (3 + 1) dimensions that was proposed by Nordstrøm in 1913.”
From General relativity in (1 + 1) dimensions (2008) · cites this paper as [12]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Nordström G., 1912, Physik. Zeitschr., 13, 1126
- 10.1002/andp.19133450503 · DOI
- Einstein A., 1913, Entwurf einer verallgemeinerten Relativitätstheorie und einer Theorie der Gravitation, Zeitschr. f. Math. u. Phys., 62, 21
Cited by
The Confrontation between General Relativity and Experiment
Will, C. M. (2014) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-2014-4 · Cited by 3,996
Theory and Experiment in Gravitational Physics
Will, C. M. (2018) · doi:10.1017/9781316338612 · Cited by 3,637
The Confrontation between General Relativity and Experiment
Will, C. M. (2006) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-2006-3 · Cited by 1,606
Tensor-multi-scalar theories of gravitation
Damour, T., & Esposito-Farese, G. (1992) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/9/9/015 · Cited by 1,016
Nordstrom's scalar theory of gravity and the equivalence principle
Deruelle, N. (2011) · General Relativity and Gravitation · doi:10.1007/s10714-011-1247-x · Cited by 59
Conformally Flat Spacetimes and Weyl Frames
Romero, C., Fonseca-Neto, J. B., & Pucheu, M. L. (2012) · Foundations of Physics · doi:10.1007/s10701-011-9593-9 · Cited by 23
General relativity in (1 + 1) dimensions
Boozer, A. D. (2008) · European Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/0143-0807/29/2/013 · Cited by 13
Diffeomorphism invariant classical-quantum path integrals for Nordström gravity
Oppenheim, J., Russo, A., & Weller-Davies, Z. (2024) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.110.024007 · Cited by 12
Small vacuum energy from small equivalence violation in scalar gravity
Agrawal, P., & Sundrum, R. (2017) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep05(2017)144 · Cited by 12
Nordström gravity coupled to point particles in (1+1) dimensions
Boozer, A. D. (2010) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.81.064022 · Cited by 2
Nordström gravity in(1+1)dimensions coupled to matter
Boozer, A. D. (2011) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.84.024035 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Nordström, G.
- Venue
- Annalen der Physik
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1913-01
- Volume
- 347
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 533-554
- ISSN
- 0003-3804
- 1521-3889
- Cited by
- 160
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
