The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Scanning Tunneling Microscopy and Atomic Force Microscopy in Organic Chemistry
Abstract
When Kekulé awoke from dreams of snakes biting their own tails, he didn't have the benefit of a scanning tunneling microscope (STM) image to confirm that his vision of benzene as a cyclic molecule was accurate. References to STM in the chemical literature increase steadily, although the technique was perhaps oversold in its early days of the 1980s, with such promises as DNA sequencing and tailored bi‐molecular chemical reactions (literally, two molecules). Publications alternate between attempting to explain the process by which images of traditional insulators are obtained and simply presenting the end images themselves as stunning views of atoms and molecules. While imaging mechanisms are still being debated, these instruments' ability to “see” single molecules has been established, albeit at the fringes of our expectations. For example, whereas STM studies at present might not be able to answer the question of why adsorption of CO doubles the density of platinum atoms on the surface of a single crystal of the metal, the images go far in illustrating that this is a process which platinum undergoes. As with any emerging analytical tool, these scanning, very localized microscopic methods are undergoing the growing pains of irreproducible results and mis‐marketed artifacts. Nonetheless, we assemble here, primarily for the uninitiated, a collection of careful and credible studies to mark the progress of scanning tunneling microscopy and atomic force microscopy into chemistry, and to encourage a healthy blend of idealism and skepticism toward future work.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Positioning single atoms with a scanning tunnelling microscope
Eigler, D. M., & Schweizer, E. K. (1990) · Nature · doi:10.1038/344524a0 · Cited by 3,161
Hydration forces between phospholipid bilayers
Rand, R. P., & Parsegian, V. A. (1989) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Reviews on Biomembranes · doi:10.1016/0304-4157(89)90010-5 · Cited by 1,125
The shear properties of Langmuir—Blodgett layers
Briscoe, B. J., & Evans, D. C. B. (1982) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspa.1982.0048 · Cited by 411
Cited by
Aurbach, D., Zaban, A., Ein-Eli, Y., Weissman, I., Chusid, O., Markovsky, B., Levi, M., Levi, E., Schechter, A., & Granot, E. (1997) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/s0378-7753(97)02575-5 · Cited by 502
Self-Assembly at the Liquid/Solid Interface: STM Reveals
De Feyter, S., & De Schryver, F. C. (2005) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/jp045298k · Cited by 485
Ultramicroelectrodes in Electrochemistry
Heinze, J. (1993) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition in English · doi:10.1002/anie.199312681 · Cited by 470
Probing Liquid/Solid Interfaces at the Molecular Level
Zaera, F. (2012) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr2002068 · Cited by 458
McLean, R. S., & Sauer, B. B. (1997) · Macromolecules · doi:10.1021/ma970350e · Cited by 356
Metadata
- Authors
- Frommer, J.
- Venue
- Angewandte Chemie International Edition in English
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1992-10
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1298-1328
- ISSN
- 0570-0833 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2026596709
- Cited by
- 383
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 39.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Scanning Tunneling Microscopy and Atomic Force Microscopy in Organic Chemistry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/anie.199212981
- The paper
- Frommer, J. (1992). Scanning Tunneling Microscopy and Atomic Force Microscopy in Organic Chemistry. Angewandte Chemie International Edition in English. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.199212981
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.