The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Quantifying Intermolecular Interactions: Guidelines for the Molecular Recognition Toolbox
Abstract
Molecular recognition events in solution are affected by many different factors that have hampered the development of an understanding of intermolecular interactions at a quantitative level. Our tendency is to partition these effects into discrete phenomenological fields that are classified, named, and divorced: aromatic interactions, cation–π interactions, CHO hydrogen bonds, short strong hydrogen bonds, and hydrophobic interactions to name a few.1 To progress in the field, we need to develop an integrated quantitative appreciation of the relative magnitudes of all of the different effects that might influence the molecular recognition behavior of a given system. In an effort to navigate undergraduates through the vast and sometimes contradictory literature on the subject, I have developed an approach that treats theoretical ideas and experimental observations about intermolecular interactions in the gas phase, the solid state, and solution from a single simplistic viewpoint. The key features are outlined here, and although many of the ideas will be familiar, the aim is to provide a semiquantitative thermodynamic ranking of these effects in solution at room temperature.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Dynamic Combinatorial Chemistry
Corbett, P. T., Leclaire, J., Vial, L., West, K. R., Wietor, J.-L., Sanders, J. K. M., & Otto, S. (2006) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr020452p · Cited by 1,922
Asymmetric Catalysis by Chiral Hydrogen‐Bond Donors
Taylor, M. S., & Jacobsen, E. N. (2006) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.200503132 · Cited by 1,906
Aromatic Rings in Chemical and Biological Recognition: Energetics and Structures
Salonen, L. M., Ellermann, M., & Diederich, F. (2011) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201007560 · Cited by 1,539
Nucleation of Organic Crystals—A Molecular Perspective
Davey, R. J., Schroeder, S. L. M., & ter Horst, J. H. (2013) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201204824 · Cited by 567
Experimental Binding Energies in Supramolecular Complexes
Biedermann, F., & Schneider, H.-J. (2016) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00583 · Cited by 554
Metadata
- Authors
- Hunter, C. A.
- Venue
- Angewandte Chemie International Edition
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-10-05
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 40
- Pages
- 5310-5324
- ISSN
- 1433-7851 (ISSN-L)
- 1521-3773
- OpenAlex
- W2098376669
- Cited by
- 1,097
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 17.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantifying Intermolecular Interactions: Guidelines for the Molecular Recognition Toolbox. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/anie.200301739
- The paper
- Hunter, C. A. (2004). Quantifying Intermolecular Interactions: Guidelines for the Molecular Recognition Toolbox. Angewandte Chemie International Edition. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.200301739
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.