The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Improved Designs of Metal–Organic Frameworks for Hydrogen Storage
Abstract
Quick on the uptake: The metal–organic framework Mg-MOF-C30 (see picture) contains Mg4O(CO2)6 building units (pink) and aromatic organic linkers containing 30 carbon atoms (teal). This material leads to 8.08 wt % H2 uptake at 77 K and 20 bar, the highest among investigated MOF structures.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Horike, S., Shimomura, S., & Kitagawa, S. (2009) · Nature Chemistry · doi:10.1038/nchem.444 · Cited by 2,486
Han, S. S., Mendoza-Cortés, J. L., & Goddard III, W. A. (2009) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/b802430h · Cited by 594
Self-citationHigh-throughput computational screening of metal–organic frameworks
Colón, Y. J., & Snurr, R. Q. (2014) · Chem. Soc. Rev. · doi:10.1039/c4cs00070f · Cited by 470
Structure-Directing Role of Graphene in the Synthesis of Metal−Organic Framework Nanowire
Jahan, M., Bao, Q., Yang, J.-X., & Loh, K. P. (2010) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja105089w · Cited by 466
Metadata
- Authors
- Han, S. S., Deng, W., & Goddard, W. A.
- Venue
- Angewandte Chemie International Edition
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-08-13
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 33
- Pages
- 6289-6292
- ISSN
- 1433-7851 (ISSN-L)
- 1521-3773
- OpenAlex
- W2045382585
- Cited by
- 223
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 18.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Improved Designs of Metal–Organic Frameworks for Hydrogen Storage. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/anie.200700303
- The paper
- Han, S. S., Deng, W., & Goddard, W. A. (2007). Improved Designs of Metal–Organic Frameworks for Hydrogen Storage. Angewandte Chemie International Edition. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.200700303
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
