The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Towards the Optimal Screening Collection: A Synthesis Strategy
Open accessAbstract
The development of effective small‐molecule probes and drugs entails at least three stages: 1) a discovery phase, often requiring the synthesis and screening of candidate compounds, 2) an optimization phase, requiring the synthesis and analysis of structural variants, 3) and a manufacturing phase, requiring the efficient, large‐scale synthesis of the optimized probe or drug. Specialized project groups tend to undertake the individual activities without prior coordination; for example, contracted (outsourced) chemists may perform the first activity while in‐house medicinal and process chemists perform the second and third development stages, respectively. The coordinated planning of these activities in advance of the first small‐molecule screen tends not to be undertaken, and each project group can encounter a bottleneck that could, in principle, have been avoided with advance planning. Therefore, a challenge for synthetic chemistry is to develop a new kind of chemistry that yields a screening collection comprising small molecules that increase the probability of success in all three phases. Although this transformative chemistry remains elusive, progress is being made. Herein, we review a newly emerging strategy in diversity‐oriented small‐molecule synthesis that may have the potential to achieve these challenging goals.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Diversity-oriented synthesis: Exploring the intersections between chemistry and biology
Tan, D. S. (2005) · Nature Chemical Biology · doi:10.1038/nchembio0705-74 · Cited by 605
Cited by
Privileged scaffolds for library design and drug discovery
Welsch, M. E., Snyder, S. A., & Stockwell, B. R. (2010) · Current Opinion in Chemical Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cbpa.2010.02.018 · Cited by 1,509
Impact of Natural Products on Developing New Anti-Cancer Agents
Cragg, G. M., Grothaus, P. G., & Newman, D. J. (2009) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr900019j · Cited by 1,302
Galloway, W. R. J. D., Isidro-Llobet, A., & Spring, D. R. (2010) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms1081 · Cited by 891
Applications of Multicomponent Reactions to the Synthesis of Diverse Heterocyclic Scaffolds
Sunderhaus, J. D., & Martin, S. F. (2009) · Chemistry – A European Journal · doi:10.1002/chem.200802140 · Cited by 745
Stereodivergence in Asymmetric Catalysis
Krautwald, S., & Carreira, E. M. (2017) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.6b13340 · Cited by 527
Metadata
- Authors
- Nielsen, T. E., & Schreiber, S. L.
- Venue
- Angewandte Chemie International Edition
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-12-13
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 48-56
- ISSN
- 1433-7851 (ISSN-L)
- 1521-3773
- OpenAlex
- W1998462789
- Cited by
- 551
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 14.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Towards the Optimal Screening Collection: A Synthesis Strategy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/anie.200703073
- The paper
- Nielsen, T. E., & Schreiber, S. L. (2008). Towards the Optimal Screening Collection: A Synthesis Strategy. Angewandte Chemie International Edition. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.200703073
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.