Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 623

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A Viable Hydrogen‐Storage System Based On Selective Formic Acid Decomposition with a Ruthenium Catalyst

Open access
Fellay, Céline, Dyson, Paul J., Laurenczy, Gábor·2008·Angewandte Chemie International Edition

Abstract

The use of formic acid as a hydrogen-storage material has become more feasible thanks to the development of a homogeneous catalytic system of ruthenium water-soluble complexes (Ru/TPPTS; TPPTS=meta-trisulfonated triphenylphosphine) that selectively decomposes HCOOH into H2 and CO2. Continuous generation of H2 of very high purity, over a wide range of pressures, and under mild conditions was achieved.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/anie.200800320

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 623

Metadata

Authors
Fellay, C., Dyson, P. J., & Laurenczy, G.
Venue
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-05-06
Volume
47
Issue
21
Pages
3966-3968
ISSN
  • 1433-7851 (ISSN-L)
  • 1521-3773
OpenAlex
W2168768221
Cited by
623
References
0
FWCI
14.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Viable Hydrogen‐Storage System Based On Selective Formic Acid Decomposition with a Ruthenium Catalyst. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/anie.200800320
The paper
Fellay, C., Dyson, P. J., & Laurenczy, G. (2008). A Viable Hydrogen‐Storage System Based On Selective Formic Acid Decomposition with a Ruthenium Catalyst. Angewandte Chemie International Edition. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.200800320

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.