The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Quantitative Evaluation of Anion–π Interactions in Solution
Abstract
Anions included: A series of meso-tetraaryl calix[4]pyrrole receptors have been used as a model system to quantify chloride–π interactions in solution (see picture; green balls are chloride ions). The free energy values are generally indicative of a repulsive interaction; their magnitude depends on the substituent on the aromatic ring.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Aromatic Rings in Chemical and Biological Recognition: Energetics and Structures
Salonen, L. M., Ellermann, M., & Diederich, F. (2011) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201007560 · Cited by 1,539
The Bright Future of Unconventional σ/π‐Hole Interactions
Bauzá, A., Mooibroek, T. J., & Frontera, A. (2015) · ChemPhysChem · doi:10.1002/cphc.201500314 · Cited by 710
Recent advances in the transmembrane transport of anions
Davis, J. T., Okunola, O., & Quesada, R. (2010) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/b926164h · Cited by 372
Chudzinski, M. G., McClary, C. A., & Taylor, M. S. (2011) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja202096f · Cited by 293
Metadata
- Authors
- Gil‐Ramírez, G., Escudero‐Adán, E. C., Benet‐Buchholz, J., & Ballester, P.
- Venue
- Angewandte Chemie International Edition
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-05-09
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 22
- Pages
- 4114-4118
- ISSN
- 1433-7851 (ISSN-L)
- 1521-3773
- OpenAlex
- W2133182004
- Cited by
- 212
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantitative Evaluation of Anion–π Interactions in Solution. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/anie.200800636
- The paper
- Gil‐Ramírez, G., Escudero‐Adán, E. C., Benet‐Buchholz, J., & Ballester, P. (2008). Quantitative Evaluation of Anion–π Interactions in Solution. Angewandte Chemie International Edition. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.200800636
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
