The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Boron: Elementary Challenge for Experimenters and Theoreticians
Abstract
Many of the fundamental questions regarding the solid‐state chemistry of boron are still unsolved, more than 200 years after its discovery. Recently, theoretical work on the existence and stability of known and new modifications of the element combined with high‐pressure and high‐temperature experiments have revealed new aspects. A lot has also happened over the last few years in the field of reactions between boron and main group elements. Binary compounds such as B 6 O, MgB 2, LiB 1−x, Na 3 B 20, and CaB 6 have caused much excitement, but the electron‐precise, colorless boride carbides Li 2 B 12 C 2, LiB 13 C 2, and MgB 12 C 2 as well as the graphite analogue BeB 2 C 2 also deserve special attention. Physical properties such as hardness, superconductivity, neutron scattering length, and thermoelectricity have also made boron‐rich compounds attractive to materials research and for applications. The greatest challenges to boron chemistry, however, are still the synthesis of monophasic products in macroscopic quantities and in the form of single crystals, the unequivocal identification and determination of crystal structures, and a thorough understanding of their electronic situation. Linked polyhedra are the dominating structural elements of the boron‐rich compounds of the main group elements. In many cases, their structures can be derived from those that have been assigned to modifications of the element. Again, even these require a critical revision and discussion.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Recent Advances in Electrocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution Using Nanoparticles
Zhu, J., Hu, L., Zhao, P., Lee, L. Y. S., & Wong, K.-Y. (2020) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00248 · Cited by 3,133
Understanding Boron through Size-Selected Clusters: Structure, Chemical Bonding, and Fluxionality
Sergeeva, A. P., Popov, I. A., Piazza, Z. A., Li, W.-L., Romanescu, C., Wang, L.-S., & Boldyrev, A. I. (2014) · Accounts of Chemical Research · doi:10.1021/ar400310g · Cited by 608
Yu, P., Wang, F., Shifa, T. A., Zhan, X., Lou, X., Xia, F., & He, J. (2019) · Nano Energy · doi:10.1016/j.nanoen.2019.01.017 · Cited by 434
Development Strategies in Transition Metal Borides for Electrochemical Water Splitting
Yao, Y., Zhang, Z., & Jiao, L. (2022) · ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL MATERIALS · doi:10.1002/eem2.12198 · Cited by 138
Kang, Y., Tang, Y., Zhu, L., Jiang, B., Xu, X., Guselnikova, O., Li, H., Asahi, T., & Yamauchi, Y. (2022) · ACS Catalysis · doi:10.1021/acscatal.2c03480 · Cited by 107
Metadata
- Authors
- Albert, B., & Hillebrecht, H.
- Venue
- Angewandte Chemie International Edition
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-10-28
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 46
- Pages
- 8640-8668
- ISSN
- 1433-7851 (ISSN-L)
- 1521-3773
- OpenAlex
- W2142764371
- Cited by
- 669
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Boron: Elementary Challenge for Experimenters and Theoreticians. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/anie.200903246
- The paper
- Albert, B., & Hillebrecht, H. (2009). Boron: Elementary Challenge for Experimenters and Theoreticians. Angewandte Chemie International Edition. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.200903246
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.