Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 176

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Relevant Anion–π Interactions in Biological Systems: The Case of Urate Oxidase

Estarellas, Carolina, Frontera, Antonio, Quiñonero, David, Deyà, Pere M.·2011·Angewandte Chemie International Edition
DOI 10.1002/anie.201005635
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Enzyme inhibited: The important role of anion–π interactions that are present in the active site of the urate oxidase enzyme is reported (see picture). The inhibition of this enzyme by cyanide ions is caused by the existence of an anion–π interaction between the inhibitor and the enzymatic substrate. This investigation extends the relevance of anion–π interactions to important fields such as enzyme chemistry.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/anie.201005635

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 176

Metadata

Authors
Estarellas, C., Frontera, A., Quiñonero, D., & Deyà, P. M.
Venue
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-12-03
Volume
50
Issue
2
Pages
415-418
ISSN
  • 1433-7851 (ISSN-L)
  • 1521-3773
DOI
10.1002/anie.201005635
OpenAlex
W2105475548
Cited by
176
References
0
FWCI
9.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Relevant Anion–π Interactions in Biological Systems: The Case of Urate Oxidase. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/anie.201005635
The paper
Estarellas, C., Frontera, A., Quiñonero, D., & Deyà, P. M. (2011). Relevant Anion–π Interactions in Biological Systems: The Case of Urate Oxidase. Angewandte Chemie International Edition. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201005635

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.