The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Nanosafety Research—Are We on the Right Track?
Open accessAbstract
The number of studies that have been published on the topic of nanosafety speaks for itself. We have seen an almost exponential rise over the past 15 years or so in the number of articles on nanotoxicology. Although only a couple of hundred papers had appeared on the topic of “Nanomaterials: environmental and health effects” before 2000, this number has exploded to over 10 000 since 2001. Most of these studies, however, do not offer any kind of clear statement on the safety of nanomaterials. On the contrary, most of them are either self‐contradictory or arrive at completely erroneous conclusions. Three years ago in this Journal we underscored the deficiencies in the way these studies were designed and pointed out the sources of error in the methods used. Now, on the basis of a comprehensive review of the literature and with the help of selected toxicological end points, we attempt to indicate where the significant weaknesses of these studies lie and what we must improve in the future.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Oops they did it again! Carbon nanotubes hoax scientists in viability assays
Wörle-Knirsch, J. M., Pulskamp, K., & Krug, H. F. (2006) · Nano Letters · doi:10.1021/nl060177c · Cited by 994
Self-citationDeposition and biokinetics of inhaled nanoparticles
Geiser, M., & Kreyling, W. G. (2010) · Particle and Fibre Toxicology · doi:10.1186/1743-8977-7-2 · Cited by 747
Driscoll, K. E. (2000) · Toxicological Sciences · doi:10.1093/toxsci/55.1.24 · Cited by 578
Yazdi, A. S., Guarda, G., Riteau, N., Drexler, S. K., Tardivel, A., Couillin, I., & Tschopp, J. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1008155107 · Cited by 525
Cited by
Piella, J., Bastús, N. G., & Puntes, V. (2017) · Bioconjugate Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.6b00575 · Cited by 382
Nanoparticles and innate immunity: new perspectives on host defence
Boraschi, D., Italiani, P., Palomba, R., Decuzzi, P., Duschl, A., Fadeel, B., & Moghimi, S. M. (2017) · Seminars in Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.smim.2017.08.013 · Cited by 310
Wang, L., Zhang, T., Li, P., Huang, W., Tang, J., Wang, P., Liu, J., Yuan, Q., Bai, R., Li, B., et al. (2015) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.5b02483 · Cited by 290
Wuttke, S., Lismont, M., Escudero, A., Rungtaweevoranit, B., & Parak, W. J. (2017) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.01.025 · Cited by 286
Valsami-Jones, E., & Lynch, I. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aad0768 · Cited by 232
Metadata
- Authors
- Krug, H. F.
- Venue
- Angewandte Chemie International Edition
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-10-10
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 46
- Pages
- 12304-12319
- ISSN
- 1433-7851 (ISSN-L)
- 1521-3773
- OpenAlex
- W2152622435
- Cited by
- 421
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 25.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nanosafety Research—Are We on the Right Track? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/anie.201403367
- The paper
- Krug, H. F. (2014). Nanosafety Research—Are We on the Right Track? Angewandte Chemie International Edition. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201403367
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.