The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sulfur‐Doped Graphene Derived from Cycled Lithium–Sulfur Batteries as a Metal‐Free Electrocatalyst for the Oxygen Reduction Reaction
Abstract
Heteroatom‐doped carbon materials have been extensively investigated as metal‐free electrocatalysts to replace commercial Pt/C catalysts in oxygen reduction reactions in fuel cells and Li–air batteries. However, the synthesis of such materials usually involves high temperature or complicated equipment. Graphene‐based sulfur composites have been recently developed to prolong the cycling life of Li–S batteries, one of the most attractive energy‐storage devices. Given the high cost of graphene, there is significant demand to recycle and reuse graphene from Li–S batteries. Herein, we report a green and cost‐effective method to prepare sulfur‐doped graphene, achieved by the continuous charge/discharge cycling of graphene–sulfur composites in Li–S batteries. This material was used as a metal‐free electrocatalyst for the oxygen reduction reaction and shows better electrocatalytic activity than pristine graphene and better methanol tolerance durability than Pt/C.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Improved Oxygen Reduction Activity on Pt 3 Ni(111) via Increased Surface Site Availability
Stamenkovic, V. R., Fowler, B., Mun, B. S., Wang, G., Ross, P. N., Lucas, C. A., & Marković, N. M. (2007) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1135941 · Cited by 4,421
Cited by
Higgins, D., Zamani, P., Yu, A., & Chen, Z. (2016) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c5ee02474a · Cited by 525
Zhao, S.-N., Song, X.-Z., Song, S.-Y., & Zhang, H.-J. (2017) · Coordination Chemistry Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2017.02.010 · Cited by 336
Emerging new generation electrocatalysts for the oxygen reduction reaction
Raj, C. R., Samanta, A., Noh, S. H., Mondal, S., Okajima, T., & Ohsaka, T. (2016) · Journal of Materials Chemistry A · doi:10.1039/c6ta03300h · Cited by 201
Zhang, C., Wang, B., Shen, X., Liu, J., Kong, X., Chuang, S. S. C., Yang, D., Dong, A., & Peng, Z. (2016) · Nano Energy · doi:10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.10.051 · Cited by 157
Metadata
- Authors
- Ma, Z., Dou, S., Shen, A., Tao, L., Dai, L., & Wang, S.
- Venue
- Angewandte Chemie International Edition
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-12-05
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1888-1892
- ISSN
- 1433-7851 (ISSN-L)
- 1521-3773
- OpenAlex
- W2097201662
- Cited by
- 365
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 14.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sulfur‐Doped Graphene Derived from Cycled Lithium–Sulfur Batteries as a Metal‐Free Electrocatalyst for the Oxygen Reduction Reaction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/anie.201410258
- The paper
- Ma, Z., Dou, S., Shen, A., Tao, L., Dai, L., & Wang, S. (2015). Sulfur‐Doped Graphene Derived from Cycled Lithium–Sulfur Batteries as a Metal‐Free Electrocatalyst for the Oxygen Reduction Reaction. Angewandte Chemie International Edition. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201410258
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.