The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
From Lithium‐Ion to Sodium‐Ion Batteries: Advantages, Challenges, and Surprises
Abstract
Mobile and stationary energy storage by rechargeable batteries is a topic of broad societal and economical relevance. Lithium‐ion battery (LIB) technology is at the forefront of the development, but a massively growing market will likely put severe pressure on resources and supply chains. Recently, sodium‐ion batteries (SIBs) have been reconsidered with the aim of providing a lower‐cost alternative that is less susceptible to resource and supply risks. On paper, the replacement of lithium by sodium in a battery seems straightforward at first, but unpredictable surprises are often found in practice. What happens when replacing lithium by sodium in electrode reactions? This review provides a state‐of‐the art overview on the redox behavior of materials when used as electrodes in lithium‐ion and sodium‐ion batteries, respectively. Advantages and challenges related to the use of sodium instead of lithium are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The development and future of lithium ion batteries
Blomgren, G. E. (2017) · Journal of The Electrochemical Society · doi:10.1149/2.0251701jes · Cited by 1,940
Rapidly falling costs of battery packs for electric vehicles
Nykvist, B., & Nilsson, M. (2015) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate2564 · Cited by 1,819
Cited by
Metal–organic frameworks as a platform for clean energy applications
Li, X., Yang, X., Xue, H., Pang, H., & Xu, Q. (2020) · EnergyChem · doi:10.1016/j.enchem.2020.100027 · Cited by 706
Tabelin, C. B., Dallas, J., Casanova, S., Pelech, T., Bournival, G., Saydam, S., & Canbulat, I. (2021) · Minerals Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.mineng.2020.106743 · Cited by 533
Sun, Y., Guo, S., & Zhou, H. (2019) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c8ee01006d · Cited by 322
Hou, B., Wang, Y., Liu, D., Gu, Z., Feng, X., Fan, H., Zhang, T., Lü, C., & Wu, X. (2018) · Advanced Functional Materials · doi:10.1002/adfm.201805444 · Cited by 253
Tang, Y., Cen, Z., Ma, Q., Zheng, B., Cai, Z., Liu, S., & Wu, D. (2023) · Advanced Science · doi:10.1002/advs.202206924 · Cited by 27
Metadata
- Authors
- Nayak, P. K., Yang, L., Brehm, W., & Adelhelm, P.
- Venue
- Angewandte Chemie International Edition
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-11-20
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 102-120
- ISSN
- 1433-7851 (ISSN-L)
- 1521-3773
- OpenAlex
- W2636773388
- Cited by
- 2,674
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 67.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: From Lithium‐Ion to Sodium‐Ion Batteries: Advantages, Challenges, and Surprises. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/anie.201703772
- The paper
- Nayak, P. K., Yang, L., Brehm, W., & Adelhelm, P. (2018). From Lithium‐Ion to Sodium‐Ion Batteries: Advantages, Challenges, and Surprises. Angewandte Chemie International Edition. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201703772
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
