Cited by 79Chemical Synthesis and AnalysisSupramolecular Chemistry and ComplexesComputational Drug Discovery Methods

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Drug‐Like Properties in Macrocycles above MW 1000: Backbone Rigidity versus Side‐Chain Lipophilicity

Open access

Abstract

Large macrocyclic peptides can achieve surprisingly high membrane permeability, although the properties that govern permeability in this chemical space are only beginning to come into focus. We generated two libraries of cyclic decapeptides with stable cross‐β conformations, and found that peptoid substitutions within the β‐turns of the macrocycle preserved the rigidity of the parent scaffold, whereas peptoid substitutions in the opposing β‐strands led to “chameleonic” species that were rigid in nonpolar media but highly flexible in water. Both rigid and chameleonic compounds showed high permeability over a wide lipophilicity range, with peak permeabilities differing significantly depending on scaffold rigidity. Our findings indicate that modulating lipophilicity can be used to engineer favorable ADME properties into both rigid and flexible macrocyclic peptides, and that scaffold rigidity can be used to tune optimal lipophilicity.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/anie.202004550

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 46

  1. 10.1016/j.cell.2011.05.006 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1146/annurev-biochem-060713-035456 · DOI
  3. 10.1021/jm201125d · DOI
  4. 10.1016/j.bmcl.2011.01.004 · DOI
  5. 10.1016/j.bmc.2008.01.015 · DOI
  6. 10.1038/nchembio.1580 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/j.cbpa.2017.03.011 · DOI
  8. 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.5b01286 · DOI
  9. 10.1126/science.aaa4690 · DOI
  10. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00838 · DOI
  11. 10.1021/ja508766b · DOI
  12. 10.1038/nchembio.664 · DOI
  13. 10.1021/ja0563455 · DOI
  14. 10.1073/pnas.1417611111 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/j.ejmech.2015.04.049 · DOI
  16. 10.1038/nrd2590 · DOI
  17. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00008 · DOI
  18. 10.1002/med.21562 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/j.bmc.2017.08.031 · DOI
  20. 10.1002/chem.201905599 · DOI
  21. 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.8b00347 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/j.drudis.2016.02.005 · DOI
  23. 10.1002/cmdc.201600082 · DOI
  24. 10.1002/cmdc.201600083 · DOI
  25. 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.6b01246 · DOI
  26. 10.1021/acs.orglett.5b01162 · DOI
  27. 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.7b01028 · DOI
  28. 10.1038/s41467-018-06845-3 · DOI
  29. 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.6b01246 · DOI
  30. 10.1021/ja508766b · DOI
  31. 10.1021/ja00052a076 · DOI
  32. 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.8b01259 · DOI
  33. 10.1016/j.ddtec.2018.03.001 · DOI
  34. 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.6b01483 · DOI
  35. 10.1021/jm000942e · DOI
  36. 10.1021/acs.jcim.8b00485 · DOI
  37. 10.1021/jm00076a002 · DOI
  38. 10.1002/cphc.201700995 · DOI
  39. 10.1021/acs.jcim.6b00251 · DOI
  40. 10.1016/0006-2952(90)90192-N · DOI
  41. 10.1021/acs.jpcb.7b12419 · DOI
  42. 10.1021/jp962142e · DOI
  43. 10.1021/acs.jcim.9b00217 · DOI
  44. 10.1038/nchembio.1584 · DOI
  45. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00807 · DOI
  46. 10.1080/0049825042000205540a · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Furukawa, A., Schwochert, J., Pye, C. R., Asano, D., Edmondson, Q. D., Turmon, A. C., Klein, V. G., Ono, S., Okada, O., & Lokey, R. S.
Affiliations
  • Daiichi-Sankyo (Japan) (JP)
  • Unnatural Products, Inc. 250 Natural Bridges Drive Santa Cruz CA 95060 USA
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • University of California, Santa Cruz (US)
  • Tanabe Pharma Corporation (Japan) (JP)
Corresponding author
Lokey, R. Scott
Venue
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-09-17
Volume
59
Issue
48
Pages
21571-21577
ISSN
  • 1433-7851 (ISSN-L)
  • 1521-3773
OpenAlex
W3048462249
Cited by
79
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 1
FWCI
3.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Angewandte Chemie International Edition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM131135)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Chemical Synthesis and Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Supramolecular Chemistry and Complexes
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Drug Discovery › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
Keywords
macrocyclic peptides, membrane permeability, peptoids, cyclic decapeptide, ADME properties, drug-likeness, beta-turn
MeSH terms
Molecular Weight, Peptides, Molecular Structure, Macrocyclic Compounds, Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Interactions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review