Cited by 422Electrocatalysts for Energy ConversionHydrogen Storage and MaterialsAmmonia Synthesis and Nitrogen Reduction

Exploiting Ru‐Induced Lattice Strain in CoRu Nanoalloys for Robust Bifunctional Hydrogen Production

Open access
Li, Weidong, Zhao, Yunxuan, Liu, Yuan, Sun, Mingzi, Waterhouse, Geoffrey I. N., Huang, Bolong, Zhang, Kan, Zhang, Tierui +1 more·2021·Angewandte Chemie International Edition

Abstract

Designing bifunctional catalysts capable of driving the electrochemical hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) and also H 2 evolution via the hydrolysis of hydrogen storage materials such as ammonia borane (AB) is of considerable practical importance for future hydrogen economies. Herein, we systematically examined the effect of tensile lattice strain in CoRu nanoalloys supported on carbon quantum dots (CoRu/CQDs) on hydrogen generation by HER and AB hydrolysis. By varying the Ru content, the lattice parameters and Ru‐induced lattice strain in the CoRu nanoalloys could be tuned. The CoRu 0.5 /CQDs catalyst with an ultra‐low Ru content (1.33 wt.%) exhibited excellent catalytic activity for HER ( η =18 mV at 10 mA cm −2 in 1 M KOH) and extraordinary activity for the hydrolysis of AB with a turnover frequency of 3255.4 mol mol −1 (Ru) min −1 or 814.7 mol mol −1 (cat) min −1 at 298 K, respectively, representing one of the best activities yet reported for AB hydrolysis over a ruthenium alloy catalyst. Moreover, the CoRu 0.5 /CQDs catalyst displayed excellent stability during each reaction, including seven alternating cycles of HER and AB hydrolysis. Theoretical calculations revealed that the remarkable catalytic performance of CoRu 0.5 /CQDs resulted from the optimal alloy electronic structure realized by incorporating small amounts of Ru, which enabled fast interfacial electron transfer to intermediates, thus benefitting H 2 evolution kinetics. Results support the development of new and improved catalysts HER and AB hydrolysis.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/anie.202013985

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ruthenium has emerged as an attractive candidate for HER largely because of a moderate Ru-H bond strength analogous to Pt-H, which is conducive to facile HER kinetics.

    “ruthenium (Ru) has emerged as an attractive candidate, largely because of a moderate strength of the ruthenium-hydrogen (Ru-H) bond that is analogous to that of Pt-H, which is conducive to facile HER kinetics [9–18]”

    From Atomically dispersed ruthenium in carbon aerogels as effective catalysts for pH-universal hydrogen evolution reaction (2022) · cites this paper as [13]

    The Introduction calls Ru a promising HER electrocatalyst in alkaline media, but attributes this to fast water dissociation—not a moderate Ru–H bond. It says Ru–H interactions are usually too strong and that overbinding hinders hydrogen desorption, contrary to the claimed explanation for facile HER kinetics. The cited passages provide no Pt–H bond-strength analogy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Li, W., Zhao, Y., Liu, Y., Sun, M., Waterhouse, G. I. N., Huang, B., Zhang, K., Zhang, T., & Lu, S.
Affiliations
  • Zhengzhou University (CN)
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
  • Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK)
  • University of Auckland (NZ)
  • Nanjing University of Science and Technology (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Huang, Bolong
  • Lu, Siyu
Venue
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-12-08
Volume
60
Issue
6
Pages
3290-3298
ISSN
  • 1433-7851 (ISSN-L)
  • 1521-3773
OpenAlex
W3094409766
Cited by
422
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 59 · 2024: 91 · 2023: 63 · 2022: 109 · 2021: 71 · 2020: 2
FWCI
12.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Angewandte Chemie International Edition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PolyU Institutional Research Archive (Hong Kong Polytechnic University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Postdoctoral Research Foundation of China (2018M640681, 2019T120632)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Hydrogen Storage and Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Catalysis › Ammonia Synthesis and Nitrogen Reduction
Keywords
electrocatalytic hydrogen evolution, ammonia borane hydrolysis, hydrogen storage materials, carbon quantum dots, catalyst stability, interfacial electron transfer, alloy electronic structure, hydrogen evolution kinetics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review