Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 162

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Electrocatalytic Urea Synthesis with 63.5 % Faradaic Efficiency and 100 % N‐Selectivity via One‐step C−N coupling

Open access
Zhang, Xiaoran, Zhu, Xiaorong, Bo, Shuowen, Chen, Chen, Cheng, Kai, Zheng, Jianyun, Li, Shuang, Tu, Xiaojin, Chen, Wei, Xie, Chao, Wei, Xiaoxiao, Wang, Dongdong, Liu, Yingying, Chen, Pinsong, Jiang, San Ping, Li, Yafei, Liu, Qinghua, Li, Conggang, Wang, Shuangyin·2023·Angewandte Chemie International Edition

Abstract

Electrocatalytic urea synthesis via coupling N 2 and CO 2 provides an effective route to mitigate energy crisis and close carbon footprint. However, the difficulty on breaking N≡N is the main reason that caused low efficiencies for both electrocatalytic NH 3 and urea synthesis, which is the bottleneck restricting their industrial applications. Herein, a new mechanism to overcome the inert of the nitrogen molecule was proposed by elongating N≡N instead of breaking N≡N to realize one‐step C−N coupling in the process for urea production. We constructed a Zn−Mn diatomic catalyst with axial chloride coordination, Zn−Mn sites display high tolerance to CO poisoning and the Faradaic efficiency can even be increased to 63.5 %, which is the highest value that has ever been reported. More importantly, negligible N≡N bond breakage effectively avoids the generation of ammonia as intermediates, therefore, the N‐selectivity in the co‐electrocatalytic system reaches100 % for urea synthesis. The previous cognition that electrocatalysts for urea synthesis must possess ammonia synthesis activity has been broken. Isotope‐labelled measurements and Operando synchrotron‐radiation Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy validate that activation of N−N triple bond and nitrogen fixation activity arise from the one‐step C−N coupling process of CO species with adsorbed N 2 molecules.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/anie.202305447

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 162

Metadata

Authors
Zhang, X., Zhu, X., Bo, S., Chen, C., Cheng, K., Zheng, J., Li, S., Tu, X., Chen, W., Xie, C., Wei, X., Wang, D., Liu, Y., Chen, P., Jiang, S. P., Li, Y., Liu, Q., Li, C., & Wang, S.
Venue
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2023-07-07
Volume
62
Issue
33
Pages
e202305447-e202305447
ISSN
  • 1433-7851 (ISSN-L)
  • 1521-3773
OpenAlex
W4381309183
Cited by
162
References
1
FWCI
7.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Electrocatalytic Urea Synthesis with 63.5 % Faradaic Efficiency and 100 % N‐Selectivity via One‐step C−N coupling. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/anie.202305447
The paper
Zhang, X., Zhu, X., Bo, S., Chen, C., Cheng, K., Zheng, J., Li, S., Tu, X., Chen, W., Xie, C., Wei, X., Wang, D., Liu, Y., Chen, P., Jiang, S. P., Li, Y., Liu, Q., Li, C., & Wang, S. (2023). Electrocatalytic Urea Synthesis with 63.5 % Faradaic Efficiency and 100 % N‐Selectivity via One‐step C−N coupling. Angewandte Chemie International Edition. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202305447

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.