Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 299

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 309 of the 309 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Review on strategies for improving the added value and expanding the scope of CO2 electroreduction products

Jiang, Minghang, Wang, Huaizhu, Zhu, Mengfei, Luo, Xiaojun, He, Yi, Wang, Mengjun, Wu, Caijun, Zhang, Liyun, Li, Xiao, Liao, Xuemei, Jiang, Zhenju, Jin, Zhong·2024·Chemical Society Reviews

Abstract

This review summarizes promising strategies including the design of catalysts and the construction of coupled electrocatalytic reaction systems, aimed at achieving the selective production of various products from CO 2 electroreduction.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/d3cs00857f

Cites

309 of 309 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 309 references

Metadata

Authors
Jiang, M., Wang, H., Zhu, M., Luo, X., He, Y., Wang, M., Wu, C., Zhang, L., Li, X., Liao, X., Jiang, Z., & Jin, Z.
Venue
Chemical Society Reviews
Published
2024
Volume
53
Issue
10
Pages
5149-5189
ISSN
  • 0306-0012 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-4744
OpenAlex
W4393861964
Cited by
299
References
309
FWCI
5.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Review on strategies for improving the added value and expanding the scope of CO2 electroreduction products. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/d3cs00857f
The paper
Jiang, M., Wang, H., Zhu, M., Luo, X., He, Y., Wang, M., Wu, C., Zhang, L., Li, X., Liao, X., Jiang, Z., & Jin, Z. (2024). Review on strategies for improving the added value and expanding the scope of CO2 electroreduction products. Chemical Society Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1039/d3cs00857f

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.