Cited by 1Counseling, Therapy, and Family DynamicsMigration, Health and TraumaCounseling Practices and Supervision

From moral condemnation to acceptance, compassion and understanding of context: Reflections on practice principles supporting healing in families from refugee and asylum seeker backgrounds

Caveny, Katherine, Tipping, Susannah, Rezaei, Elham, Akimana, Septime, Brooks, Harrison, Flihan, Rima, Khanijou, Suphawan (Saakshi), Kuyang, Magdalena +6 more·2024·Australian and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy

Abstract

Informed by participatory action research methodology, this article adopts a unique collaborative co‐writing process providing a means for practitioners of diverse cultural and professional backgrounds to share and reflect on family work, including but not limited to family therapy, happening across a specialist torture and trauma recovery service. Through exploring historical and contemporary ways of working with families at the Queensland Program of Assistance to Survivors of Torture and Trauma, an agency providing support to people from refugee backgrounds, some common practice principles were identified as well as key theories and frameworks underpinning collective family work. Guiding principles identified include: the need for a systemic lens, flexibility in service delivery, building safety and trusting relationships, cultural humility and valuing lived experience, recognising complexity and avoiding assumptions, and listening and responding to client and community needs. In moving away from moral condemnation, the article underscores the value of thinking systemically and abiding by recognising each family's unique story and the need for culturally sensitive interventions. Ongoing opportunities to connect over practice are considered valuable for practitioners engaged in different types of family work.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/anzf.1613

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Caveny, K., Tipping, S., Rezaei, E., Akimana, S., Brooks, H., Flihan, R., Khanijou, S. (., Kuyang, M., McBride, K., Mitchell, E., Paulsen, C., Mangubat, R., Mufambali, I. S., & Sakaria, C.
Affiliations
Queensland Program of Assistance for Survivors of Torture and Trauma (QPASTT) Woolloongabba Queensland Australia
Corresponding author
Caveny, Katherine
Venue
Australian and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2024-12
Volume
45
Issue
4
Pages
449-463
ISSN
  • 0814-723X (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-8438
OpenAlex
W4405913025
Cited by
1
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1
FWCI
0.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Australian and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Migration, Health and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Counseling Practices and Supervision
Keywords
refugee families, asylum seekers, family therapy, torture survivors, trauma recovery, cultural humility, cultural sensitivity, moral condemnation, collaborative writing, lived experience

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review