From moral condemnation to acceptance, compassion and understanding of context: Reflections on practice principles supporting healing in families from refugee and asylum seeker backgrounds
Abstract
Informed by participatory action research methodology, this article adopts a unique collaborative co‐writing process providing a means for practitioners of diverse cultural and professional backgrounds to share and reflect on family work, including but not limited to family therapy, happening across a specialist torture and trauma recovery service. Through exploring historical and contemporary ways of working with families at the Queensland Program of Assistance to Survivors of Torture and Trauma, an agency providing support to people from refugee backgrounds, some common practice principles were identified as well as key theories and frameworks underpinning collective family work. Guiding principles identified include: the need for a systemic lens, flexibility in service delivery, building safety and trusting relationships, cultural humility and valuing lived experience, recognising complexity and avoiding assumptions, and listening and responding to client and community needs. In moving away from moral condemnation, the article underscores the value of thinking systemically and abiding by recognising each family's unique story and the need for culturally sensitive interventions. Ongoing opportunities to connect over practice are considered valuable for practitioners engaged in different types of family work.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Challenges Faced by Refugee New Parents from Africa in Canada
Stewart, M., Dennis, C. L., Kariwo, M., Kushner, K. E., Letourneau, N., Makumbe, K., Makwarimba, E., & Shizha, E. (2015) · Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health · doi:10.1007/s10903-014-0062-3 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Caveny, K., Tipping, S., Rezaei, E., Akimana, S., Brooks, H., Flihan, R., Khanijou, S. (., Kuyang, M., McBride, K., Mitchell, E., Paulsen, C., Mangubat, R., Mufambali, I. S., & Sakaria, C.
- Affiliations
- Queensland Program of Assistance for Survivors of Torture and Trauma (QPASTT) Woolloongabba Queensland Australia
- Corresponding author
- Caveny, Katherine
- ORCID
- Caveny, Katherine
- Venue
- Australian and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2024-12
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 449-463
- ISSN
- 0814-723X (ISSN-L)
- 1467-8438
- OpenAlex
- W4405913025
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1
- FWCI
- 0.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Australian and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Migration, Health and Trauma
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Counseling Practices and Supervision
- Keywords
- refugee families, asylum seekers, family therapy, torture survivors, trauma recovery, cultural humility, cultural sensitivity, moral condemnation, collaborative writing, lived experience
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review