Cited by 13Arsenic contamination and mitigationHeavy Metals in PlantsCoal and Its By-products

Arsenic uptake by the Douglas‐fir (Pseudotsuga menziesie)

Open access
Haug, Corinne M., Reimer, Kenneth J., Cullen, William R.·2004·Applied Organometallic Chemistry

Abstract

Abstract The Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesie) growing in an arsenic‐rich gold‐bearing region contains elevated arsenic concentrations in new‐growth stems (374 ppm dry weight (dw)) and needles (257 ppm dw). Speciation of methanol–water extracts by using high‐performance liquid chromatography–inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry show that arsenite is the major species in needles but arsenate is more dominant in stems. Only traces of methylarsenicals are present. Arsenic concentrations in other tree species growing in the region are generally much lower; dimethylarsinate was extracted from a spruce cone. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/aoc.656

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Certain gymnosperms, such as Pseudotsuga menziesie, hyperaccumulate As in needles and stems.

    “Certain gymnosperms, such as Pseudotsuga menziesie, hyperaccumulate As in needles and stems (Haug et al., 2004).”

    From Plant hyperaccumulators: a state-of-the-art review on mechanism of heavy metal transport and sequestration (2025) · cites this paper as Haug et al., 2004

    The Abstract reports elevated arsenic in Douglas-fir needles and new-growth stems. But the Discussion says more work is needed to establish whether Douglas-firs are hyperaccumulators, so the claim states that classification more firmly than the paper does. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. Warren HV, Delavault RE, Barakso J. The Canadian Institute of Mining and Metallurgical Bulletin, 1968.
  2. Craw D, Chappell D, Reay A, Walls D. N. Z. J. Geol. Geophys. 2000; 43: 373.
  3. Warren HV, Delavault RE, Barakso J. Econ. Geol. 1964; 59: 1381.
  4. Ma LQ, Komar KM, Tu C, Zhang W, Cai Y, Kenneley ED. Nature 2001; 409: 579.
  5. Francesconi K, Visoottiviseth P, Sridokchan W, Goessler W. Sci. Total Environ. 2002; 284: 27.
  6. Lai VW-M, Beach A, Cullen WR, Ray S, Reimer KJ. Appl. Organometal. Chem. 2002; 16: 458.
  7. Lai VW-M, Cullen WR, Harrington CF, Reimer KJ. Appl. Organometal. Chem. 1997; 11: 797.
  8. Cullen WR, Reimer KJ. Chem. Rev. 1989; 89: 713.
  9. Sneller FEC, Heerwaarden LMV, Kraaijeveld-Smit FJL, Bookum WMT, Koevoets PLM, New Phytol. 1999; 144: 223.
  10. Francesconi K, Edmonds J. Adv. Inorg. Chem. 1997; 44: 147.
  11. Hartley-Whitaker J, Ainsworth G, Vooijs R, Bookum WT, Schat H, Meharg AA. Plant Physiol. 2001; 126: 299.
  12. Gawel JE, Trick CG, Morel MMF. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2001; 35: 2108.
  13. Meharg AA. New Phytol. 2002; 156: 1.
  14. Cullen WR, Hettipathirana DI. Appl. Organomet. Chem. 1994; 8: 463.
  15. Tu C, Ma LQ, Zhang W, Cai Y, Harris WG. Environ. Pollut. 2003; 124: 223.
  16. Webb SM, Gaillard J-F, Ma LQ, Tu C. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2003; 31: 754.
  17. Raab A, Feldmann J, Meharg AA. Plant Physiol. 2004; 134: 1.
  18. Pickering IJ, Prince RC, George MJ, Smith RD, George GN, Salt DE. Plant Physiol. 2000; 122: 1171.
  19. Koch I, Feldmann J, Wang L, Andrewes P, Reimer KJ, Cullen WR. Sci. Total Environ. 1999; 236: 101.
  20. Mattusch J, Wennrich R, Schmidt AC, Reisser W. Fresenius' J. Anal. Chem. 2000; 366: 200.
  21. Cao X, Ma LQ, Shiralipour A. Environ. Pollut. 2003; 126: 157.
  22. Copyright  2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Appl. Organometal. Chem. 2004; 18: 626-630

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Haug, C. M., Reimer, K. J., & Cullen, W. R.
Affiliations
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • Royal Military College of Canada (CA)
Venue
Applied Organometallic Chemistry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-11-23
Volume
18
Issue
12
Pages
626-630
ISSN
  • 0268-2605 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-0739
OpenAlex
W2019608169
Cited by
13
References
22
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Applied Organometallic Chemistry (publishedVersion)
Funders
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Arsenic contamination and mitigation
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Heavy Metals in Plants
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geochemistry and Petrology › Coal and Its By-products
Keywords
arsenic uptake, Pseudotsuga menziesii, arsenic speciation, arsenite, arsenate, dimethylarsinate, tree needles, tree trunk, methylmercury

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review