CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 65

Recent advances in soy protein extraction technology

Zhao, Yuan, Tian, Ran, Xu, Zejian, Jiang, Lianzhou, Sui, Xiaonan·2023·Journal of the American Oil Chemists' Society
DOI 10.1002/aocs.12676

Published version of a preprint

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Protein extraction from soybeans is a vital part of the soy industry. Traditionally, the extraction of soy protein has been done by alkaline extraction and isoelectric precipitation. With the advancement of technology, more extraction techniques have been developed, and are superior to this traditional method. In this review, the composition and classification of soy protein are summarized. Next, the current emerging technologies for soy protein extraction are highlighted. Three extraction technologies, namely reverse micellar, enzyme‐assisted and membrane ultrafiltration, are reviewed in detail. Finally, the research prospects and trends of soy protein extraction technology are also summarized.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/aocs.12676

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 58

  1. Ali F, Ippersiel D, Lamarche F, Mondor M. Characterization of low-phytate soy protein isolates produced by membrane technologies. Innovative Food Sci Emerging Technol. 2010;11:162-168.
  2. Anh TLQ, Hoa NTQ, Nguyen PDT, Thanh HV, Nguyen PB, Anh LTH, et al. Soybean Protein Extraction by Alcalase and Flavourzyme, Combining Thermal Pretreatment for Enteral Feeding Product. Catalysts. 2020;10, 10.3390.
  3. Bu G, Yang Y, Chen F, Liao Z, Gao Y, Yang H, et al. Extraction and physicochemical properties of soya bean protein and oil by a new reverse micelle system compared with other extraction methods. Int J Food Sci Tech. 2014;49:1079-1089.
  4. Bu GH, Liu HY, Chen FS, Liu KL, Yang YY, Gao YX. Effect of different factors on forward extraction of soy protein in reverse micelle systems. Afr J Adv Biotechnol. 2012;11, 7247-7257.
  5. Campbell KA GC, Johnson LA, Jung S, de Moura JMN, Kapchie V, Murphy P. Advances in aqueous extraction processing of soybeans. J Am Oil Chem Soc. 2011;88:449-465.
  6. Correa NM, Durantini EN, Silber JJ. Binding of nitrodiphenylamines to reverse micelles of AOT in n-hexane and carbon tetrachloride: solvent and substitute effects. Colloid Interf Sci. 1998;208, 296-103.
  7. De Moura JMLN, Campbell K, Mahfuz A, Jung S, Glatz CE, Johnson L. Enzyme-assisted aqueous extraction of oil and protein from soybeans and cream de-emulsification. J Am Oil Chem Soc. 2008;85, 985-995.
  8. Du Y, Zhang Q, Zhao X, Chen F. Effect of reverse micelle on physicochemical properties of soybean 7S globulins. J Food Eng. 2020;282:110026.
  9. Fisher R, Glatz CE, Murphy P. Effects of mixing during acid addition on fractionally precipitated protein. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1986;28:1056-1063.
  10. Fuglestad B, Gupta K, Wand AJ, Sharp KA. Characterization of cetyltrimethylammonium bromide/hexanol reverse micelles by experimentally benchmarked molecular dynamics simulations. Langmuir. 2016;32(37), 1674-1684.
  11. Garcia M, Torre M, Marina M, Laborda F, Rodriquez AR. Composition and characterization of soybean and related products. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 1997;37:361-391.
  12. Ghazi K, Domimique P, Jean-Pierre K, Tahar T, Pierre L. Slow dynamics of water in reverse micelles. Comptes Rendus Chimie. 2006;9, 493-497.
  13. Grynspan F, Cheryan M. Phytate-calcium interactions with soy protein. J Am Oil Chem Soc. 1989;66:93-97.
  14. Guanhao B. Effects of different factors on the forward extraction of soy protein in reverse micelle systems. Afr J Biotechnol. 2012;11, 10.5897.
  15. Harikrishna S, Srinivas ND, Raghavarao KSMS, Karanth NG. Reverse micellar extraction for downstream processing of proteins/enzymes. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol. 2002;75, 119-183.
  16. Hoa N T, Minh N P. Investigation of enzymatic optimization by flavorsome and cellular for soy protein hydrolysate powder. Int J Adv Pharm Biol Chem. 2014;3: 563-574.
  17. Hong DP. Evaluation of the alcohol-mediated interaction between micelles using percolation processes of reverse micellar systems. Kuboi R Biochem Eng J. 1999;4:23-29.
  18. Hong SC PK, Son YH, Jung HS, Kim K, Choi SJ. AOT/isooctane reverse micelles with a microaqueous core act as protective shells for enhancing the thermal stability of Chromobacterium viscosum lipase. Chang PS Food Chem. 2015;179:263-269.
  19. Jung S, Lamsal BP, Stepien V, Johnson LA, Murphy PA. The functionality of soy protein produced by enzyme-assisted extraction. J Am Oil Chem Soc. 2006;83, 71-78.
  20. Kim HJ, Kim BK. Comparison of soy protein concentrates produced using membrane ultrafiltration and acid precipitation. Food Sci Biotechnol. 2015;24:67-73.
  21. Kinsella JE. Functional properties of soy proteins. J Am Oil Chem Soc. 1979;56:242-258.
  22. Lamsal BP, Murphy PA, Johnson LA. Flaking and extrusion as mechanical treatments for enzyme-assisted aqueous extraction of oil from soybeans. J Am Oil Chem Soc. 2006;83, 973-979.
  23. Lawhon J, Rhee K, Lusas E. Soy protein ingredients prepared by new processes-Aqueous processing and industrial membrane isolation. J Am Oil Chem Soc. 1981;58:377-384.
  24. Lawhon JTH, Mulsow D, Mattil KF. Optimization of protein isolate production from soy flour using indus- trial membrane systems. J Food Sci. 1978;43, 361-364.
  25. Lee BK, Hong DP, Lee SS, Kuboi R. Analysis of protein back-extraction processes in alcohol-and carboxylic acidmediated AOT reverse micellar systems based on structural changes of proteins and reverse micelles. Biochem Eng J. 2004;22,71-79.
  26. Lepori CM, Correa NM, Silber JJ, Falcone RD. How the cation 1-butyl3-methylimidazolium impacts the interaction between the entrapped water and the reverse micelle interface created with an ionic liquid-like surfactant. Soft Matter. 2016;12(13), 830-844.
  27. Leser ME LP. The use of reverse micelles for the simultaneous extraction of oil and proteins from vegetable meal. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1989;34:1140-1146.
  28. Lu W, Chen XW, Wang JM, Yang XQ, Qi JR. Enzyme-assisted subcritical water extraction and character- ization of soy protein from a heat-denatured meal. J Food Eng. 2016;169:250-258.
  29. Luisi PL, Giomini M, Pileni R. Reverse micelles as hosts for protein and small molecules. Biochimical Biophysica Acta. 1988;947, 209-246.
  30. Luo D, Zhao Q, Zhao M, Yang B, Long X, Ren J, et al. Effects of limited proteolysis and high-pressure homogenization on structural and functional characteristics of glycinin. Food Chem. 2010;122:25-30.
  31. Mondor M, Ali F, Ippersiel D, Lamarche F. Impact of ultrafiltration/diafiltration sequence on the production of soy protein isolate by membrane technologies. Innov Food Sci Emerg Technol. 2010;11:491-497.
  32. Nichols DJ. Production of soy isolates by ultrafiltration: factors affecting yield and composition. J Food Sci. 1981;46(42): 367-372.
  33. Omosaiye O, Cheryan M, Matthews M. Removal of oligosaccharides from soybean water extracts by ultra- filtration. J Food Sci. 1978;43:354-360.
  34. Pearson A. Soy proteins. Dev Food Sci. 1983;2:67-108.
  35. Perović MN, Knežević Jugović ZD, Antov MG. Improved recovery of protein from soy grit by enzyme-assisted alkaline extraction. J Food Eng. 2020;276, 10.1016.
  36. Puri M, Sharma D, Barrow, CJ. Enzyme-assisted extraction of bioactives from plants. Trends Biotechnol. 2012;30, 37-44.
  37. Rajib KM, Bidyut KB. Effect of NaCl and temperature on the water solubilization behavior of AOT/nonionic mixed reverse micellar systems stabilized in IPM oil. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp. 2005;255(252), 165-180.
  38. Rao A, Shallo H, Ericson A, Thomas R. Characterization of soy protein concentrate produced by membrane ultrafiltration. J Food Sci. 2002;67:1412-1418.
  39. Rho SGK. Solubilization of BSA into AOT reverse micelles using the phase-transfer method: effects of pH and salts. J Ind Eng Chem. 2004;10, 247-251.
  40. Rosenthal A PD, Niranjan K. Aqueous and enzymatic process for edible oil extraction. Enzyme Microb Technol. 1996;19:402-420.
  41. Rosenthal A PDL, Niranjan K. Combined effect of operational variables and enzyme activity on aqueous enzymatic extraction of oil and protein from soybean. Enzyme Microb Technol. 2001;28(26): 499-509.
  42. S OH. Continuous pilot plant production of bean protein by extraction, centrifugation, ultrafiltration and spray drying. Lebensm-Wiss U-Technol. 1978;11: 57-64.
  43. Sari YW, Bruins ME, Sanders JPM. Enzyme assisted protein extraction from rapeseed, soybean, and mi- croalgae meals. Industrial Crops and Products. 2013;43:78-83.
  44. Sereti V ZM, Papadimitriou V, Pispas S, Xenakis A. Biocolloids based on amphiphilic block copolymers as a medium for enzyme encapsulation. J Phys Chem B. 2014;118(132):9808-9816.
  45. Shallo H, Rao A, Ericson A, Thomas R. Preparation of soy protein concentrate by ultrafiltration. J Food Sci. 2001;66:242-246.
  46. Shin YOV. Solubilization limit of lysozyme into DODMAC reverse micelles. Biotech Bioeng. 2002;80, 537-543.
  47. Sun X, Bandara N. Applications of reverse micelles technique in food science: A comprehensive review. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2019;91:106-115.
  48. Vergara-Barber M, Lerma-García MJ, Herrero-Martínez JM, Sim o-Alfonso EF. Use of an enzyme-assisted method to improve protein extraction from olive leaves. Food Chem. 2015;169, 128-133.
  49. Wang H, Johnson L, Wang T. Preparation of soy protein concentrate and isolate from extruded-expelled soybean meals. J Am Oil Chem Soc. 2004;81:713-717.
  50. Wei CL, Lu W, Yang J, Wang MP, Yang XQ, Wang JM. Physicochemical properties of soy protein prepared by enzyme-assisted countercurrent extraction. Int J Food Sci Tech. 2017;53:1389-1396.
  51. Wieser H. Chemistry of gluten proteins. Food Microbiol. 2007;24:115-119.
  52. Wu W, Hettiarachchy N, Qi M. Hydrophobicity, solubility, and emulsifying properties of soy protein peptides prepared by papain modification and ultrafiltration. J Am Oil Chem Soc. 1998;75:845-850.
  53. Yang J, Guo J, Yang XQ, Wu NN, Zhang JB, Hou JJ, et al. A novel soy protein isolate prepared from soy pro- tein concentrate using jet-cooking combined with enzyme-assisted ultra-filtration. J Food Eng. 2014;143:25- 32.
  54. Yao F, Chen FS, Du Y, Zhang Q, Zhu TW. Functional and structural properties of soy 11S globulin: Influence of reverse micelle extraction. J Food Sci. 2021;86:3403-3412.
  55. Zarkadas CG, Gagnon C, Gleddie S, Khanizadeh S, Cober ER, Guillemette RJD. Assessment of the protein quality of fourteen soybean cultivars using amino acid analysis and two-dimensional electrophoresis. Food Res Int. 2007;40, 129-146.
  56. Zhang Y MK, Yamauchi F. Hydrolysis of soybean proteins by a vortex flow filtration membrane reactor with Aspergillus oryzae proteases. J Food Sci. 1996;61(65): 928-931.
  57. Zhao X, Chen F, Gai G, Chen J, Xue W, Lee L. Effects of extraction temperature, ionic strength and contact time on the efficiency of bis(2-ethylhexyl) sodium sulfosuccinate (AOT) reverse micellar backward extraction of soy protein and isoflavones from soy flour. J Sci Food Agric. 2008;88:590-596.
  58. Zhao X, Chen J, Lu Z, Ling X, Deng P, Zhu Q, et al. Analysis of the amino acids of soy globulins by AOT reverse micelles and aqueous buffer. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2011;165:802-813.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhao, Y., Tian, R., Xu, Z., Jiang, L., & Sui, X.
Affiliations
College of Food Science Northeast Agricultural University Harbin China
ORCID
Sui, Xiaonan
Venue
Journal of the American Oil Chemists' Society
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2022-12-30
Volume
100
Issue
3
Pages
187-195
ISSN
  • 0003-021X
  • 1558-9331
DOI
10.1002/aocs.12676
Cited by
65
References
0
Language
en
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (32022068, U22A20548)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review