The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Chemical modification of hemp, sisal, jute, and kapok fibers by alkalization
Abstract
Plant fibers are rich in cellulose and they are a cheap, easily renewable source of fibers with the potential for polymer reinforcement. The presence of surface impurities and the large amount of hydroxyl groups make plant fibers less attractive for reinforcement of polymeric materials. Hemp, sisal, jute, and kapok fibers were subjected to alkalization by using sodium hydroxide. The thermal characteristics, crystallinity index, reactivity, and surface morphology of untreated and chemically modified fibers have been studied using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), X‐ray diffraction (WAXRD), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM), respectively. Following alkalization the DSC showed a rapid degradation of the cellulose between 0.8 and 8% NaOH, beyond which degradation was found to be marginal. There was a marginal drop in the crystallinity index of hemp fiber while sisal, jute, and kapok fibers showed a slight increase in crystallinity at caustic soda concentration of 0.8–30%. FTIR showed that kapok fiber was found to be the most reactive followed by jute, sisal, and then hemp fiber. SEM showed a relatively smooth surface for all the untreated fibers; however, after alkalization, all the fibers showed uneven surfaces. These results show that alkalization modifies plant fibers promoting the development of fiber–resin adhesion, which then will result in increased interfacial energy and, hence, improvement in the mechanical and thermal stability of the composites. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 84: 2222–2234, 2002
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
DHAKAL, H., ZHANG, Z., & RICHARDSON, M. (2007) · Composites Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.compscitech.2006.06.019 · Cited by 1,622
Additive manufacturing of natural fiber reinforced polymer composites: Processing and prospects
Balla, V. K., Kate, K. H., Satyavolu, J., Singh, P., & Tadimeti, J. G. D. (2019) · Composites Part B: Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.106956 · Cited by 580
Kamarudin, S. H., Mohd Basri, M. S., Rayung, M., Abu, F., Ahmad, S., Norizan, M. N., Osman, S., Sarifuddin, N., Desa, M. S. Z. M., Abdullah, U. H., et al. (2022) · Polymers · doi:10.3390/polym14173698 · Cited by 459
Fiore, V., Scalici, T., & Valenza, A. (2014) · Carbohydrate Polymers · doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.02.016 · Cited by 417
Cherian, B. M., Pothan, L. A., Nguyen-Chung, T., Mennig, G., Kottaisamy, M., & Thomas, S. (2008) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jf8003674 · Cited by 363
Metadata
- Authors
- Mwaikambo, L. Y., & Ansell, M. P.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Polymer Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-03-19
- Volume
- 84
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2222-2234
- ISSN
- 0021-8995 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-4628
- OpenAlex
- W2000814017
- Cited by
- 1,694
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Chemical modification of hemp, sisal, jute, and kapok fibers by alkalization. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/app.10460
- The paper
- Mwaikambo, L. Y., & Ansell, M. P. (2002). Chemical modification of hemp, sisal, jute, and kapok fibers by alkalization. Journal of Applied Polymer Science. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.10460
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.