The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A study on nanofiber‐reinforced thermoplastic composites (II): Investigation of the mixing rheology and conduction properties
Abstract
This article is portion of a comprehensive study on the development of nanofiber‐reinforced polymer composites for electrostatic discharge materials and structural composites. Vapor‐grown carbon fibers with an average diameter of 100 nm were used as a precursor and model fiber system for carbon nanotubes. These nanofibers were purified and functionalized to provide for an open network of high‐purity nanofibers. Banbury‐type mixing was used to disperse the nanofibers in the polymer matrix. Rheological and microscopic analysis showed that the high shear processing of the polymer/nanofiber mixture led to a homogeneous dispersion of nanofibers with no agglomerates present and no shortening of the nanofibers. The shear thinning behavior of polymeric materials helps in the mixing of the nanofibers to form the composites. A percolation threshold for electrical conduction of 9–18 wt % was observed for the highly dispersed nanofiber networks. The electrical behavior of these materials was not affected by changes in humidity. Microscopic analysis showed highly dispersed nanofibers with no indications of porosity. These conducting polymers are well suited for electrostatic discharge applications, and might well become multifunctional materials for strength/electrical applications. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 80: 1162–1172, 2001
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Big returns from small fibers: A review of polymer/carbon nanotube composites
Breuer, O., & Sundararaj, U. (2004) · Polymer Composites · doi:10.1002/pc.20058 · Cited by 1,246
Rheological behavior of multiwalled carbon nanotube/polycarbonate composites
Pötschke, P., Fornes, T. D., & Paul, D. R. (2002) · Polymer · doi:10.1016/s0032-3861(02)00151-9 · Cited by 1,243
Dispersion of Carbon Nanotubes in Liquids
Hilding, J., Grulke, E. A., George Zhang, Z., & Lockwood, F. (2003) · Journal of Dispersion Science and Technology · doi:10.1081/dis-120017941 · Cited by 668
Recent Progress in Additive Manufacturing of Fiber Reinforced Polymer Composite
Goh, G. D., Yap, Y. L., Agarwala, S., & Yeong, W. Y. (2019) · Advanced Materials Technologies · doi:10.1002/admt.201800271 · Cited by 621
Nanofiber‐reinforced polymers prepared by fused deposition modeling
Shofner, M. L., Lozano, K., Rodríguez‐Macías, F. J., & Barrera, E. V. (2003) · Journal of Applied Polymer Science · doi:10.1002/app.12496 · Cited by 484
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Lozano, K., Bonilla‐Rios, J., & Barrera, E. V.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Polymer Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-03-08
- Volume
- 80
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1162-1172
- ISSN
- 0021-8995 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-4628
- OpenAlex
- W2058956379
- Cited by
- 292
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A study on nanofiber‐reinforced thermoplastic composites (II): Investigation of the mixing rheology and conduction properties. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/app.1200
- The paper
- Lozano, K., Bonilla‐Rios, J., & Barrera, E. V. (2001). A study on nanofiber‐reinforced thermoplastic composites (II): Investigation of the mixing rheology and conduction properties. Journal of Applied Polymer Science. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.1200
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.