The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Nanofiber‐reinforced polymers prepared by fused deposition modeling
Abstract
Vapor‐grown carbon fibers (VGCFs), a practical model nanofiber for single‐walled carbon nanotubes, were combined with an acrylonitrile–butadiene–styrene (ABS) copolymer to create a composite material for use with fused deposition modeling (FDM). Continuous filament feedstock materials were extruded from Banbury mixed composites with a maximum composition of 10 wt % nanofibers. Issues of dispersion, porosity, and fiber alignment were studied. SEM images indicated that the VGCFs were well dispersed and evenly distributed in the matrix and that no porosity existed in the composite material following FDM processing. VGCFs aligned both in the filament feedstock and in the FDM traces suggested that nanofibers, in general, can be aligned through extrusion/shear processing. The feedstock materials were processed into test specimens for mechanical property comparisons with unfilled ABS. The VGCF‐filled ABS swelled less than did the plain ABS at similar processing conditions due to the increased stiffness. The tensile strength and modulus of the VGCF‐filled ABS increased an average of 39 and 60%, respectively, over the unfilled ABS. Storage modulus measurements from dynamic mechanical analysis indicated that the stiffness increased 68%. The fracture behavior of the composite material indicated that the VGCFs act as restrictions to the chain mobility of the polymer. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 89: 3081–3090, 2003
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Additive manufacturing (3D printing): A review of materials, methods, applications and challenges
Ngo, T. D., Kashani, A., Imbalzano, G., Nguyen, K. T. Q., & Hui, D. (2018) · Composites Part B: Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.012 · Cited by 8,431
Wickramasinghe, S., Do, T., & Tran, P. (2020) · Polymers · doi:10.3390/polym12071529 · Cited by 1,052
Recent Progress in Additive Manufacturing of Fiber Reinforced Polymer Composite
Goh, G. D., Yap, Y. L., Agarwala, S., & Yeong, W. Y. (2019) · Advanced Materials Technologies · doi:10.1002/admt.201800271 · Cited by 621
Additive manufacturing of natural fiber reinforced polymer composites: Processing and prospects
Balla, V. K., Kate, K. H., Satyavolu, J., Singh, P., & Tadimeti, J. G. D. (2019) · Composites Part B: Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.106956 · Cited by 580
Thermo-mechanical properties of a highly filled polymeric composites for Fused Deposition Modeling
Nikzad, M., Masood, S. H., & Sbarski, I. (2011) · Materials & Design · doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2011.01.056 · Cited by 503
Metadata
- Authors
- Shofner, M. L., Lozano, K., Rodríguez‐Macías, F. J., & Barrera, E. V.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Polymer Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-06-27
- Volume
- 89
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 3081-3090
- ISSN
- 0021-8995 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-4628
- OpenAlex
- W2010223088
- Cited by
- 484
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nanofiber‐reinforced polymers prepared by fused deposition modeling. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/app.12496
- The paper
- Shofner, M. L., Lozano, K., Rodríguez‐Macías, F. J., & Barrera, E. V. (2003). Nanofiber‐reinforced polymers prepared by fused deposition modeling. Journal of Applied Polymer Science. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.12496
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.