Cited by 254Microbial bioremediation and biosurfactantsEnvironmental Chemistry and Analysisbiodegradable polymer synthesis and properties

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Aerobic biodegradation of cellulose acetate

Buchanan, Charles M., Gardner, Robert M., Komarek, Ronald J.·1993·Journal of Applied Polymer Science

Abstract

Two separate assay systems were used to evaluate the biodegradation potential of cellulose acetate: an in vitro enrichment cultivation technique (closed batch system), and a system in which cellulose diacetate (CDA) films were suspended in a wastewater treatment system (open continuous feed system). The in vitro assay employed a stable enrichment culture, which was initiated by inoculating a basal salts medium containing cellulose acetate with 5% (v/v) activated sludge. Microscopic examination revealed extensive degradation of CDA (DS = 2.5) fibers after 2–3 weeks of incubation. Characterization of the CA fibers recovered from inoculated flasks demonstrated a lower average degree of substitution and a change in the mol wt profiles.In vitro enrichments with CDA (DS = 1.7) films were able to degrade > 80% of the films in 4–5 days. Cellulose acetate (DS = 2.5) films required 10–12 days for extensive degradation. Films prepared from cellulose triacetate remained essentially unchanged after 28 days in the in vitro assay. The wastewater treatment assay was less active than the in vitro enrichment system. For example, approximately 27 days were required for 70% degradation of CDA (DS = 1.7) films to occur while CDA (DS = 2.5) films required approximately 10 weeks before significant degradation was obtained. Supporting evidence for the biodegradation potential of cellulose acetate was obtained through the conversion of cellulose [1‐14 C]‐acetate to 14 CO 2 in the in vitro assay. The results of this work demonstrate that cellulose acetate fibers and films are potentially biodegradable and that the rate of biodegradation is highly dependent on the degree of substitution. © 1993 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/app.1993.070471001

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 8 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Kasulke U., 1983, Cellulose Chem. Technol., 17, 423
  2. SAS Institute Inc., SAS User's Guide: Statistics, Version 5 Ed., 956

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Buchanan, C. M., Gardner, R. M., & Komarek, R. J.
Affiliations
Eastman Chemical Company (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Buchanan, Charles M.
Venue
Journal of Applied Polymer Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1993-03-10
Volume
47
Issue
10
Pages
1709-1719
ISSN
  • 0021-8995 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-4628
OpenAlex
W2164314640
Cited by
254
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 12
FWCI
8.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Applied Polymer Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Microbial bioremediation and biosurfactants
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Environmental Chemistry and Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
Keywords
cellulose acetate, aerobic biodegradation, cellulose diacetate, cellulose triacetate, degree of substitution, biodegradable polymers, polymer films, polymer fibers, activated sludge, enrichment culture, wastewater treatment, carbon-14 labeling, molecular weight distribution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review