CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 52

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The effect of different sterilization procedures on chitosan dried powder

Yang, Yu‐Min, Zhao, Ya‐Hong, Liu, Xiao‐Hua, Ding, Fei, Gu, Xiao‐Song·2007·Journal of Applied Polymer Science
DOI 10.1002/app.25906
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the effects induced by three different sterilization methods [steam, γ‐radiation, and ethylene oxide (EO)] with different dose or time period of sterilization by means of Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, X‐ray diffraction, and assessments of molecular weight and degree of deacetylation. The experiment results clearly showed that the steam sterilization greatly darkened the color of chitosan powder; γ‐irradiation strongly depolymerized the chitosan especially at irradiation dose above 10 kGy; and exposure to EO led to minor change in crystallinity and network structure of chitosan powder. Therefore, these three methods have their respective advantages and disadvantages, suggesting that the selection of the sterilization method of chitosan should depend upon the specific requirement of the final application. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 104: 1968–1972, 2007

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/app.25906

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2005.01.003 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2005.12.009 · DOI
  3. 10.1093/brain/awh517 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.11.029 · DOI
  5. 10.1007/s10529-004-4611-z · DOI
  6. 10.1177/088532829501000203 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199823)43:3<282::AID-JBM9>3.0.CO;2-J · DOI
  8. 10.1080/10717540500309123 · DOI
  9. 10.1002/jbm.b.30081 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/S8756-3282(99)00136-2 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/S0144-8617(96)00033-1 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/S0144-8617(02)00026-7 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.04.017 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/0141-8130(91)90027-R · DOI
  15. Cao W., 2005, Nucl Tech, 28, 187
  16. 10.1016/S0735-1097(98)00401-X · DOI
  17. 10.1016/0142-9612(96)00055-5 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2004.05.243 · DOI
  19. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19970808)65:6<1193::AID-APP15>3.0.CO;2-V · DOI
  20. 10.1016/S0142-9612(00)00126-5 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 52

Metadata

Authors
Yang, Y., Zhao, Y., Liu, X., Ding, F., & Gu, X.
Venue
Journal of Applied Polymer Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-02-26
Volume
104
Issue
3
Pages
1968-1972
ISSN
  • 0021-8995
  • 1097-4628
DOI
10.1002/app.25906
Cited by
52
References
0
Language
en
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review