Cited by 59Natural Fiber Reinforced CompositesPolymer crystallization and propertiesWood Treatment and Properties

Thermal and mechanical properties of polypropylene/wood‐flour composites

Ndiaye, Diène, Matuana, Laurent M., Morlat‐Therias, Sandrine, Vidal, Loïc, Tidjani, Adams, Gardette, Jean‐Luc·2011·Journal of Applied Polymer Science

Abstract

In this research, polypropylene/wood‐flour composites (WPCs) were blended with different contents of wood and/or maleated polypropylene (MAPP) and clay. We found that the addition of MAPP or clay in the formulation greatly improved the dispersion of the wood fibers in the composite; this suggested that MAPP or clay may have played the role of an adhesion promoter in the WPCs. The results obtained with clay indicate that it also acted as a flame retardant. The thermal tests carried out with the produced samples showed an increased crystallization temperature (Tc), crystallinity, and melting temperature (Tm) with wood loading. The increase of the two former parameters was explained by the incorporation of wood flour, which played the role of nucleating agent and induced the crystallization of the matrix polymer. On the other hand, the Tm increase was ascribed to the insulating properties of wood, which hindered the movement of heat conduction. The effects of UV irradiation on Tm and Tc were also examined. Tc increased with UV exposure time; this implied that UV degradation generated short chains with low molecular weight that could move easily in the bulk of the sample and, thus, catalyze early crystallization. The flexural strength and modulus increased with increasing wood‐flour content. In contrast, the impact strength and tensile strength and strain decreased with increasing wood‐flour content. All of these changes were related to the level of dispersion of the wood flour in the polymeric matrix. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2011

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/app.32985

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ndiaye, D., Matuana, L. M., Morlat‐Therias, S., Vidal, L., Tidjani, A., & Gardette, J.
Affiliations
  • Université Gaston Berger (SN)
  • Michigan State University (US)
  • Cheikh Anta Diop University (SN)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Corresponding author
Ndiaye, Diène
Venue
Journal of Applied Polymer Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-09-29
Volume
119
Issue
6
Pages
3321-3328
ISSN
  • 0021-8995 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-4628
OpenAlex
W2002102084
Cited by
59
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 7
FWCI
2.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Applied Polymer Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Polymer crystallization and properties
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Wood Treatment and Properties
Keywords
wood-plastic composites, maleated polypropylene, clay, adhesion promoters, flame retardancy, crystallization temperature, crystallinity, melting point, UV degradation, flexural strength, impact strength, tensile strength

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review