The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A review of fracturing fluid systems used for hydraulic fracturing of oil and gas wells
Open accessAbstract
Hydraulic fracturing has been used by the oil and gas industry as a way to boost hydrocarbon production since 1947. Recent advances in fracturing technologies, such as multistage fracturing in horizontal wells, are responsible for the latest hydrocarbon production boom in the US. Linear or crosslinked guars are the most commonly used fluids in traditional fracturing operations. The main functions of these fluids are to open/propagate the fractures and transport proppants into the fractures. Proppants are usually applied to form a thin layer between fracture faces to prop the fractures open at the end of the fracturing process. Chemical breakers are used to break the polymers at the end of the fracturing process so as to provide highly conductive fractures. Concerns over fracture conductivity damage by viscous fluids in ultra‐tight formations found in unconventional reservoirs prompted the industry to develop an alternative fracturing fluid called “slickwater”. It consists mainly of water with a very low concentration of linear polymer. The low concentration polymer serves primarily to reduce the friction loss along the flow lines. Proppant‐carrying capability of this type of fluids is still a subject of debate among industry experts. Constraints on local water availability and the potential for damage to formations have led the industry to develop other types of fracturing fluids such as viscoelastic surfactants and energized fluids. This article reviews both the traditional viscous fluids used in conventional hydraulic fracturing operations as well as the new family of fluids being developed for both traditional and unconventional reservoirs. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2014, 131, 40735.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Recent advances in cellulose and its derivatives for oilfield applications
Liu, K., Du, H., Zheng, T., Liu, H., Zhang, M., Zhang, R., Li, H., Xie, H., Zhang, X., Ma, M., et al. (2021) · Carbohydrate Polymers · doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.117740 · Cited by 389
Materials chemistry and the futurist eco-friendly applications of nanocellulose: Status and prospect
Mishra, R. K., Sabu, A., & Tiwari, S. K. (2018) · Journal of Saudi Chemical Society · doi:10.1016/j.jscs.2018.02.005 · Cited by 382
Wollastonite Carbonation in Water-Bearing Supercritical CO2: Effects of Particle Size
Min, Y., Li, Q., Voltolini, M., Kneafsey, T., & Jun, Y.-S. (2017) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.7b04475 · Cited by 74
Min, Y., & Jun, Y.-S. (2018) · Chemical Geology · doi:10.1016/j.chemgeo.2018.01.012 · Cited by 52
Impacts of Organic Ligands on Forsterite Reactivity in Supercritical CO2 Fluids
Miller, Q. R. S., Kaszuba, J. P., Schaef, H. T., Bowden, M. E., & McGrail, B. P. (2015) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es506065d · Cited by 44
Metadata
- Authors
- Barati, R., & Liang, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Polymer Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-04-07
- Volume
- 131
- Issue
- 16
- ISSN
- 0021-8995 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-4628
- OpenAlex
- W2122891192
- Cited by
- 790
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 33.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A review of fracturing fluid systems used for hydraulic fracturing of oil and gas wells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/app.40735
- The paper
- Barati, R., & Liang, J. (2014). A review of fracturing fluid systems used for hydraulic fracturing of oil and gas wells. Journal of Applied Polymer Science. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.40735
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.