The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Hydrolytic degradation of biodegradable polyesters under simulated environmental conditions
Abstract
In this study, the durability of poly(butylene succinate) (PBS), poly(butylene adipate‐co‐terephthalate) (PBAT), and PBS/PBAT blend was assessed by exposure to 50°C and 90% relative humidity for a duration of up to 30 days. Due to the easy hydrolysis of esters, the mechanical properties of PBS and PBAT were significantly affected with increasing conditioning time. The PBS, PBAT, and PBS/PBAT showed an increase in modulus as well as a decrease in tensile strength and elongation at break with increased exposure time. Furthermore, the impact strength of PBAT remains unaffected up to 30 days of exposure. However, it was clearly observed that the fracture mode of PBS/PBAT changed from ductile to brittle after being exposed to high heat and humid conditions. This may be attributed to the hydrolysis products of PBS accelerating the degradation of PBAT in the PBS/PBAT blend. The differential scanning calorimetry results suggested that the crystallinity of the samples increased after being exposed to elevated temperature and humidity. This phenomenon was attributed to the induced crystallization from low molecular weight polymer chains that occurred during hydrolysis. Therefore, low molecular weight polymer chains are often favored to the crystallinity enhancement. The increase in crystallinity eventually increased the modulus of the conditioned samples. The enhanced crystallinity was further confirmed by polarizing optical microscopy analysis. Moreover, the hydrolysis of the polyesters was evaluated by scanning electron microscopy, rheology, and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy analysis. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci.2015,132, 42189.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Vroman, I., & Tighzert, L. (2009) · Materials · doi:10.3390/ma2020307 · Cited by 1,355
Copinet, A., Bertrand, C., Govindin, S., Coma, V., & Couturier, Y. (2004) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2003.11.038 · Cited by 288
Deroiné, M., Le Duigou, A., Corre, Y.-M., Le Gac, P.-Y., Davies, P., César, G., & Bruzaud, S. (2014) · Polymer Degradation and Stability · doi:10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2014.01.020 · Cited by 279
Kinetics and Time−Temperature Equivalence of Polymer Degradation
Lyu, Schley, J., Loy, B., Lind, D., Hobot, C., Sparer, R., & Untereker, D. (2007) · Biomacromolecules · doi:10.1021/bm070313n · Cited by 237
Xu, H., Teng, C., & Yu, M. (2006) · Polymer · doi:10.1016/j.polymer.2006.03.090 · Cited by 113
Deng, M., Zhou, J., Chen, G., Burkley, D., Xu, Y., Jamiolkowski, D., & Barbolt, T. (2005) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.09.067 · Cited by 75
Cited by
Biodegradable compatibilized polymer blends for packaging applications: A literature review
Muthuraj, R., Misra, M., & Mohanty, A. K. (2018) · Journal of Applied Polymer Science · doi:10.1002/app.45726 · Cited by 391
Self-citationMuthuraj, R., Misra, M., & Mohanty, A. K. (2015) · ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering · doi:10.1021/acssuschemeng.5b00646 · Cited by 107
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Muthuraj, R., Misra, M., & Mohanty, A. K.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Polymer Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-04-10
- Volume
- 132
- Issue
- 27
- ISSN
- 0021-8995 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-4628
- OpenAlex
- W1975208903
- Cited by
- 167
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 3.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.