Cited by 16biodegradable polymer synthesis and propertiesPolymer crystallization and propertiesPolymer Nanocomposites and Properties

Modifying the Mechanical, Viscoelastic, Thermal, and Degradation Properties of PLA / PBAT Blends With Nanoclay and PEG

Open access
Sooraj, V., Bhagavatula, Sai Gopal Krishna, Kannan, Murugasamy·2025·Journal of Applied Polymer Science

Abstract

In this research, polylactic acid (PLA) was blended with polybutylene adipate terephthalate (PBAT) to enhance PLA's processability, heat resistance, toughness, and flexibility. In this context, the biodegradability of PLA can be maximized in PLA/PBAT blends, as PBAT is also biodegradable and offers an alternative resource for the biobased components of PLA, despite PBAT's primary derivation from fossil fuel sources. However, the immiscibility of these two neat polymers restricts the overall effectiveness of polymer blends. To address this issue, plasticizers such as polyethylene glycol (PEG) and nanoparticles like nanoclay were added to the blends to enhance their miscibility. The polymer blend underwent analysis through static mechanical testing, creep testing, differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The results show that nanoclay plays a significant role in improving elongation in tensile properties. The addition of 5 parts nanoclay to the 70/30 PLA/PBAT composition shows an elongation‐at‐break of 30%, compared to 4.7% for the 70/30 blend, without significant changes in modulus and strength. TGA analysis shows that neat PBAT has better thermal stability than PLA, whereas the thermal stability of the PLA/PBAT blend was observed to be lower than that of neat PLA.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/app.57087

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Sooraj, V., Bhagavatula, S. G. K., & Kannan, M.
Affiliations
Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham (IN)
Corresponding author
Kannan, Murugasamy
Venue
Journal of Applied Polymer Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2025-04-07
Volume
142
Issue
26
ISSN
  • 0021-8995 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-4628
OpenAlex
W4409236943
Cited by
16
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 5
FWCI
3.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal of Applied Polymer Science (publishedVersion)
Funders
Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham University
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Polymer crystallization and properties
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties
Keywords
polylactic acid, poly(butylene adipate-co-terephthalate), PLA/PBAT blends, nanoclay, polyethylene glycol, blend miscibility, biodegradable polymers, viscoelasticity, creep behavior, thermal stability, degradation, tensile properties, plasticizers, nanocomposites

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review