Cited by 7Gene expression and cancer classificationPlant Molecular Biology ResearchGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies

Expression‐based machine learning models for predicting plant tissue identity

Open access
Palande, Sourabh, Arsenault, Jeremy, Basurto‐Lozada, Patricia, Bleich, Andrew, Brown, Brianna N. I., Buysse, Sophia F., Connors, Noelle A., Das Adhikari, Sikta +33 more·2025·Applications in Plant Sciences

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Premise: The selection of Arabidopsis as a model organism played a pivotal role in advancing genomic science. The competing frameworks to select an agricultural‐ or ecological‐based model species were rejected, in favor of building knowledge in a species that would facilitate genome‐enabled research. Methods: Here, we examine the ability of models based on Arabidopsis gene expression data to predict tissue identity in other flowering plants. Comparing different machine learning algorithms, models trained and tested on Arabidopsis data achieved near perfect precision and recall values, whereas when tissue identity is predicted across the flowering plants using models trained on Arabidopsis data, precision values range from 0.69 to 0.74 and recall from 0.54 to 0.64. Results: The identity of belowground tissue can be predicted more accurately than other tissue types, and the ability to predict tissue identity is not correlated with phylogenetic distance from Arabidopsis . k ‐nearest neighbors is the most successful algorithm, suggesting that gene expression signatures, rather than marker genes, are more valuable to create models for tissue and cell type prediction in plants. Discussion: Our data‐driven results highlight that the assertion that knowledge from Arabidopsis is translatable to other plants is not always true. Considering the current landscape of abundant sequencing data, we should reevaluate the scientific emphasis on Arabidopsis and prioritize plant diversity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/aps3.11621

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Palande, S., Arsenault, J., Basurto‐Lozada, P., Bleich, A., Brown, B. N. I., Buysse, S. F., Connors, N. A., Das Adhikari, S., Dobson, K. C., Guerra‐Castillo, F. X., Guerrero‐Carrillo, M. F., Harlow, S., Herrera‐Orozco, H., Hightower, A. T., Izquierdo, P., Jacobs, M., Johnson, N. A., Leuenberger, W., Lopez‐Hernandez, A., Luckie‐Duque, A., Martínez‐Avila, C., Mendoza‐Galindo, E. J., Plancarte, D. C., Schuster, J. M., Shomer, H., Sitar, S. C., Steensma, A. K., Thomson, J. E., Villaseñor‐Amador, D., Waterman, R., Webster, B. M., Whyte, M., Zorilla‐Azcué, S., Montgomery, B. L., Husbands, A. Y., Krishnan, A., Percival, S., Munch, E., VanBuren, R., Chitwood, D. H., & Rougon‐Cardoso, A.
Affiliations
  • Michigan State University (US)
  • Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (MX)
  • Department of Computational Mathematics, Science and Engineering Michigan State University East Lansing Michigan USA
  • Mexican Social Security Institute (MX)
  • Laboratory of Agrigenomic Sciences, Escuela Nacional de Estudios Superiores Unidad León Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México León Guanajuato Mexico
  • Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Facultad de Estudios Superiores Iztacala (MX)
  • Laboratorio Internacional de Investigación sobre el Genoma Humano (LIIGH) Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México Juriquilla Querétaro Mexico
  • Programa de Posgrado en Ciencias Biológicas, Escuela Nacional de Estudios Superiores (ENES) Unidad Morelia, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México Morelia Michoacán Mexico
  • Grinnell College (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • University of Colorado Anschutz (US)
Corresponding author
  • Chitwood, Daniel H.
  • Rougon‐Cardoso, Alejandra
Venue
Applications in Plant Sciences
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2024-10-19
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
e11621-e11621
ISSN
2168-0450 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4403567301
Cited by
7
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2
FWCI
0.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Applications in Plant Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (2310357, 1828149, 2310355, 2039489, 2310356)
  • U.S. Department of Agriculture
  • Michigan State University
  • National Institute of Food and Agriculture
  • College of Engineering, Michigan State University
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene expression and cancer classification
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Molecular Biology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Keywords
gene expression signatures, Arabidopsis, cross-species transferability, flowering plants, k-nearest neighbors, model organism selection, phylogenetic distance, marker genes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review