Cited by 153Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and AnimalsPlant Molecular Biology ResearchGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies

The Arabidopsis genome: A foundation for plant research

Open access
Bevan, Michael, Walsh, Sean·2005·Genome Research

Abstract

The sequence of the first plant genome was completed and published at the end of 2000. This spawned a series of large-scale projects aimed at discovering the functions of the 25,000+ genes identified in Arabidopsis thaliana (Arabidopsis). This review summarizes progress made in the past five years and speculates about future developments in Arabidopsis research and its implications for crop science. The provision of large populations of gene disruption lines to the research community has greatly accelerated the impact of genomics on many areas of plant science. The tools and community organization required for plant integrative and systems biology approaches are now ready to accomplish the next big step in plant biology—the integration of knowledge and modeling of biological processes. In the future, plant science will continue to be enriched by the alignment of high-quality basic research (generally conducted in Arabidopsis), with strategic objectives in crop plants. The sequence and analysis of an increasing number of crop plant genomes enhance this alignment and provide new insights into genome evolution and crop plant domestication.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/gr.3723405

Cites

98 of 98 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 99 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bevan, M., & Walsh, S.
Affiliations
John Innes Centre (GB)
Corresponding author
Bevan, Michael
Venue
Genome Research
Published
2005-12
Volume
15
Issue
12
Pages
1632-1642
ISSN
1088-9051 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2166592994
Cited by
153
References
99
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 9
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Genome Research (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Molecular Biology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Keywords
Arabidopsis thaliana, plant genome, gene function discovery, plant systems biology, mathematical biology, cultivated plants, genome evolution, crop domestication, plant genomics
MeSH terms
Arabidopsis, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Gene Expression Regulation, Plant, DNA, Plant, Genome, Plant, Genomics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review