The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The effects of introduced tilapias on native biodiversity
Abstract
The common name ‘tilapia’ refers to a group of tropical freshwater fish in the family Cichlidae (Oreochromis, Tilapia, and Sarotherodon spp.) that are indigenous to Africa and the southwestern Middle East. Since the 1930s, tilapias have been intentionally dispersed worldwide for the biological control of aquatic weeds and insects, as baitfish for certain capture fisheries, for aquaria, and as a food fish. They have most recently been promoted as an important source of protein that could provide food security for developing countries without the environmental problems associated with terrestrial agriculture. In addition, market demand for tilapia in developed countries such as the United States is growing rapidly. Tilapias are well‐suited to aquaculture because they are highly prolific and tolerant to a range of environmental conditions. They have come to be known as the ‘aquatic chicken’ because of their potential as an affordable, high‐yield source of protein that can be easily raised in a range of environments — from subsistence or ‘backyard’ units to intensive fish hatcheries. In some countries, particularly in Asia, nearly all of the introduced tilapias produced are consumed domestically; tilapias have contributed to basic food security for such societies. This review indicates that tilapia species are highly invasive and exist under feral conditions in every nation in which they have been cultured or introduced. Thus, the authors have concluded that, despite potential or observed benefits to human society, tilapia aquaculture and open‐water introductions cannot continue unchecked without further exacerbating damage to native fish species and biodiversity. Recommendations include restricting tilapia culture to carefully managed, contained ponds, although exclusion is preferred when it is feasible. Research into culture of indigenous species is also recommended. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Global Biodiversity Scenarios for the Year 2100
Sala, O. E., Stuart Chapin, F., III, Armesto, J. J., Berlow, E., Bloomfield, J., Dirzo, R., Huber-Sanwald, E., Huenneke, L. F., Jackson, R. B., et al. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.287.5459.1770 · Cited by 9,280
Basic Principles and Ecological Consequences of Altered Flow Regimes for Aquatic Biodiversity
BUNN, S. E., & ARTHINGTON, A. H. (2002) · Environmental Management · doi:10.1007/s00267-002-2737-0 · Cited by 3,379
Self-citationQuantifying Threats to Imperiled Species in the United States
Wilcove, D. S., Rothstein, D., Dubow, J., Phillips, A., & Losos, E. (1998) · BioScience · doi:10.2307/1313420 · Cited by 3,097
Effect of aquaculture on world fish supplies.
Naylor, R. L., Goldburg, R. J., Primavera, J. H., Kautsky, N., Beveridge, M. C. M., Clay, J., Folke, C., Lubchenco, J., Mooney, H., & Troell, M. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35016500 · Cited by 3,063
Biological Invasions. A global perspective.
Drake, J. A., Mooney, H. A., di Castri, F., Groves, R. H., Kruger, F. J., Rejmanek, M., & Williamson, M. (1989) · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · doi:10.5281/zenodo.18199125 · Cited by 1,663
Species Diversity and Biological Invasions: Relating Local Process to Community Pattern
Levine, J. M. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.288.5467.852 · Cited by 1,133
The cichlid fishes of the great lakes of Africa: their biology and evolution,
Fryer, G., & Iles, T. D. (1972) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 982
Tilapiine fishes of the genera Sarotherodon, Oreochromis, and Danakilia /
Trewavas, E., & History), B. M. (. (1983) · British Museum (Natural History) eBooks · doi:10.5962/bhl.title.123198 · Cited by 815
The Natural history of Madagascar
(2004) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.41-6524 · Cited by 797
The Cichlid Fishes of the Great Lakes of Africa. Their Biology and Evolution
Greenwood, P. H., Fryer, G., & Iles, T. D. (1973) · Copeia · doi:10.2307/1442393 · Cited by 625
Cited by
Aquaculture Production and Biodiversity Conservation
Diana, J. S. (2009) · BioScience · doi:10.1525/bio.2009.59.1.7 · Cited by 448
O’Mara, K., Venarsky, M., Stewart-Koster, B., McGregor, G. B., Schulz, C., Marshall, J., & Bunn, S. E. (2024) · Hydrobiologia · doi:10.1007/s10750-024-05676-2 · Cited by 18
“…a wide range of water quality and habitat conditions and possess a reproductive strategy that allows them to rapidly establish in a new environment (Canonico et al., 2005; Russell et al., 2012), with a substantial amount of potential habitat identified in the Mitchell River catchment (O’Mara et…”
Metadata
- Authors
- Canonico, G. C., Arthington, A., McCrary, J. K., & Thieme, M. L.
- Venue
- Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-09
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 463-483
- ISSN
- 1052-7613 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-0755
- OpenAlex
- W2064013311
- Cited by
- 532
- References
- 34
- FWCI
- 4.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The effects of introduced tilapias on native biodiversity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/aqc.699
- The paper
- Canonico, G. C., Arthington, A., McCrary, J. K., & Thieme, M. L. (2005). The effects of introduced tilapias on native biodiversity. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems. https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.699
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.