Cited by 66Medical and Biological SciencesNerve injury and regenerationPeripheral Neuropathies and Disorders

The perineurium of peripheral nerves

Sunderland, S., Bradley, K. C.·1952·The Anatomical Record

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ar.1091130202

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The thicker perineurium of a larger fascicle provides increased resistance, increasing the amount of current necessary to activate that fascicle.

    “The thicker perineurium of a larger fascicle provides increased resistance, increasing the amount of current necessary to activate that fascicle [52].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 3 · Cited by 66

Authors
Sunderland, S., & Bradley, K. C.
Affiliations
The University of Melbourne (AU)
Venue
The Anatomical Record
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1952-06
Volume
113
Issue
2
Pages
125-141
ISSN
  • 0003-276X (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0185
OpenAlex
W2108107618
Cited by
66
References
3
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2013: 2
FWCI
1.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Anatomical Record (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anatomy › Medical and Biological Sciences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Nerve injury and regeneration
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Peripheral Neuropathies and Disorders
Keywords
perineurium, peripheral nerves, nerve sheath, nerve anatomy
MeSH terms
Humans, Peripheral Nerves

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review