The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Autoradiographic investigation of cell proliferation in the brains of rats and cats
Abstract
Cell proliferation in the brains of rats and cats was investigated autoradiographically. Two young adult rats were injected intraperitoneally with 2 mc of thymidine‐H 3 and killed after a two weeks' exchange period. Two adult cats were injected intraventricularly with 0.5 mc of thymidine‐H 3 and killed one week later. Labeling of cell nuclei in the brain, presumed to reflect DNA turnover and cellular proliferation, was investigated. In the rats, some neuroglia cells were found labeled in all parts of the brain, suggesting a low rate of glial proliferation. In addition, circumscribed small regions with numerous labeled neuroglia and microglia cells were seen in several brain regions, suggesting the occurrence of local glial proliferative reactions in these presumably normal brains. A few apparently labeled neurons were seen in the neocortex, and a proliferative region of granule cells was identified in the dentate gyrus of the hippocampus. In the cats labeling of glia cells was highest in the midline region, near the point of injection of the radiochemical, with a gradient of decreasing number of labeled cells both laterally and in the anteroposterior direction of the neuraxis. Neurons with apparently labeled nuclei were observed in the midline cortex bilaterally in both animals. These results indicate that glia cells can multiply in the brains of young adult rats and adult cats and they support the possibility that new neurons may be formed in forebrain structures, both in rodents and carnivores.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Autoradiographic and histological evidence of postnatal hippocampal neurogenesis in rats
Altman, J., & Das, G. D. (1965) · Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.901240303 · Cited by 3,592
Self-citationKuhn, H., Dickinson-Anson, H., & Gage, F. (1996) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.16-06-02027.1996 · Cited by 3,139
Continual lifelong learning with neural networks: A review
Parisi, G. I., Kemker, R., Part, J. L., Kanan, C., & Wermter, S. (2019) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2019.01.012 · Cited by 3,117
Moreno-Jiménez, E. P., Flor-García, M., Terreros-Roncal, J., Rábano, A., Cafini, F., Pallas-Bazarra, N., Ávila, J., & Llorens-Martín, M. (2019) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-019-0375-9 · Cited by 1,577
Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) stimulates neurogenesis in vitro and in vivo
Jin, K., Zhu, Y., Sun, Y., Mao, X. O., Xie, L., & Greenberg, D. A. (2002) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.182296499 · Cited by 1,507
Metadata
- Authors
- Altman, J.
- Venue
- The Anatomical Record
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1963-04
- Volume
- 145
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 573-591
- ISSN
- 0003-276X (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0185
- OpenAlex
- W2035158911
- Cited by
- 619
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Autoradiographic investigation of cell proliferation in the brains of rats and cats. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ar.1091450409
- The paper
- Altman, J. (1963). Autoradiographic investigation of cell proliferation in the brains of rats and cats. The Anatomical Record. https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.1091450409
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.