The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Regeneration of single skeletal muscle fibers in vitro
Abstract
A culture system utilizing single skeletal muscle fibers from adult rats was developed to study the origin and behavior of mononucleated myoblasts during muscle regeneration. The single fibers are removed manually from the leg and thigh muscles of 300–400 gm rats and maintained in vitro embedded in a fibrin clot overlain with culture medium. Regenerative events were monitored by continuous observation of the cultured fibers. During the first few hours in vitro the fibers undergo degenerative changes including the formation of myofibrillar contraction clots and pyknosis of myonuclei. The endomysial tube (basement lamina) remains intact along the entire length of the fiber and forms transparent chambers bridging the contraction clots. Single fibers are free of endomysial cells and display no cellular outgrowth in culture, except at the cut ends. In contrast, a rich outgrowth of endomysial connective tissue cells is found with bundles consisting of two or more fibers. Isolated mononucleated cells, presumed to be muscle satellite cells, are present within the endomysial tube of single fibers at the onset of the culture period. There is no evidence that myonuclei contribute to the formation of mononucleated cells. The satellite cells enlarge and begin to proliferate during the second day in vitro to form clones of presumptive myoblasts within the endomysial tube. The early clones have a cell doubling time of about 22 hours and exhibit mitotic synchrony. After 5–7 days in vitro the satellite cell progeny begin to fuse to from multinucleated myotubes within the endomysial tube of the original fiber. The myotubes display spontaneous contractile activity and may extend throughout the length of the endomysial tube.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nature of dividing nuclei in skeletal muscle of growing rats
Moss, F. P., & Leblond, C. P. (1970) · The Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.44.2.459 · Cited by 289
Cited by
Satellite Cells and the Muscle Stem Cell Niche
Yin, H., Price, F., & Rudnicki, M. A. (2013) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00043.2011 · Cited by 2,166
Regenerating functional myocardium: Improved performance after skeletal myoblast transplantation
Taylor, D. A., Atkins, B. Z., Hungspreugs, P., Jones, T. R., Reedy, M. C., Hutcheson, K. A., Glower, D. D., & Kraus, W. E. (1998) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm0898-929 · Cited by 1,152
Lepper, C., Partridge, T. A., & Fan, C.-M. (2011) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.067595 · Cited by 1,105
Satellite Cells and Skeletal Muscle Regeneration
Dumont, N. A., Bentzinger, C. F., Sincennes, M., & Rudnicki, M. A. (2015) · Comprehensive Physiology · doi:10.1002/cphy.c140068 · Cited by 719
Niche Regulation of Muscle Satellite Cell Self-Renewal and Differentiation
Kuang, S., Gillespie, M. A., & Rudnicki, M. A. (2008) · Cell Stem Cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2007.12.012 · Cited by 507
Metadata
- Authors
- Bischoff, R.
- Venue
- The Anatomical Record
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1975-06
- Volume
- 182
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 215-235
- ISSN
- 0003-276X (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0185
- OpenAlex
- W2144871657
- Cited by
- 278
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Regeneration of single skeletal muscle fibers in vitro. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ar.1091820207
- The paper
- Bischoff, R. (1975). Regeneration of single skeletal muscle fibers in vitro. The Anatomical Record. https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.1091820207
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.