The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Stereological Estimates of Alveolar Number and Size and Capillary Length and Surface Area in Mice Lungs
Open accessAbstract
The major function of the lung is gas exchange and depends on alveolar and capillary parameters such as surface area and volume. The number of alveoli may report on the nature of structural changes in lung parenchyma during development, illness or changing environmental factors. We therefore developed an efficient and easily applicable stereological design for estimating and monitoring these structural parameters in the mouse lung. The estimation of volume fractions of different lung compartments has been carried out by point counting. A combination of cycloid grids superimposed on vertical sections was used to estimate the capillary surface area with isotropic test lines. Capillary length could be measured using the harmonic mean of the surface weighted diameter. The Euler characteristic applied in the physical fractionator with varying but known sampling fractions (Horovitz‐Thompson estimator) enabled us to estimate alveolar number. In adult mice lungs, we obtained total values for alveolar number of 2.31 × 10 6 alveoli in a pair of lungs, alveolar surface area of 82.2 cm 2, capillary surface area of 124 cm 2, and capillary length of 1.13 km. All values are corrected for tissue shrinkage. With this study we present a highly efficient combination of several design‐based stereological tools for the unbiased estimation of alveolar number and volume as well as length, surface area, and diameter of capillaries in the mice lung. Anat Rec, 292:113–122, 2009. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The efficiency of systematic sampling in stereology—reconsidered
GUNDERSEN, H. J. G., JENSEN, E. B. V., KIÊU, K., & NIELSEN, J. (1999) · Journal of Microscopy · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2818.1999.00457.x · Cited by 1,317
Self-citation
Cited by
Activated PMN Exosomes: Pathogenic Entities Causing Matrix Destruction and Disease in the Lung
Genschmer, K. R., Russell, D. W., Lal, C., Szul, T., Bratcher, P. E., Noerager, B. D., Abdul Roda, M., Xu, X., Rezonzew, G., Viera, L., et al. (2019) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2018.12.002 · Cited by 445
The Cellular and Physiological Basis for Lung Repair and Regeneration: Past, Present, and Future
Basil, M. C., Katzen, J., Engler, A. E., Guo, M., Herriges, M. J., Kathiriya, J. J., Windmueller, R., Ysasi, A. B., Zacharias, W. J., Chapman, H. A., et al. (2020) · Cell Stem Cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2020.03.009 · Cited by 414
Structure and Composition of Pulmonary Arteries, Capillaries, and Veins
Townsley, M. I. (2012) · Comprehensive Physiology · doi:10.1002/cphy.c100081 · Cited by 277
de Barros Mendes Lopes, T., Groth, E. E., Veras, M., Furuya, T. K., de Souza Xavier Costa, N., Ribeiro Júnior, G., Lopes, F. D., de Almeida, F. M., Cardoso, W. V., Saldiva, P. H. N., et al. (2018) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2018.05.055 · Cited by 64
Metadata
- Authors
- Knust, J., Ochs, M., Gundersen, H. J. G., & Nyengaard, J. R.
- Venue
- The Anatomical Record
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-12-29
- Volume
- 292
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 113-122
- ISSN
- 1932-8486 (ISSN-L)
- 1932-8494
- OpenAlex
- W2047220877
- Cited by
- 158
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.