Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 255

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 57 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Finite element analysis in functional morphology

Open access
Richmond, Brian G., Wright, Barth W., Grosse, Ian, Dechow, Paul C., Ross, Callum F., Spencer, Mark A., Strait, David S.·2005·The Anatomical Record Part A: Discoveries in Molecular, Cellular, and Evolutionary Biology
DOI 10.1002/ar.a.20169
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This article reviews the fundamental principles of the finite element method and the three basic steps (model creation, solution, and validation and interpretation) involved in using it to examine structural mechanics. Validation is a critical step in the analysis, without which researchers cannot evaluate the extent to which the model represents or is relevant to the real biological condition. We discuss the method's considerable potential as a tool to test biomechanical hypotheses, and major hurdles involved in doing so reliably, from the perspective of researchers interested in functional morphology and paleontology. We conclude with a case study to illustrate how researchers deal with many of the factors and assumptions involved in finite element analysis. © 2005 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ar.a.20169

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 255

Metadata

Authors
Richmond, B. G., Wright, B. W., Grosse, I., Dechow, P. C., Ross, C. F., Spencer, M. A., & Strait, D. S.
Venue
The Anatomical Record Part A: Discoveries in Molecular, Cellular, and Evolutionary Biology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-03-03
Volume
283A
Issue
2
Pages
259-274
ISSN
  • 1552-4884 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-4892
DOI
10.1002/ar.a.20169
OpenAlex
W2064952361
Cited by
255
References
57
FWCI
12.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.